Fact File: the M-60 Patton

Long and short stories from the 1984 movie
Post Reply
Matt Wiser
Posts: 1140
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Fact File: the M-60 Patton

Post by Matt Wiser »

The M-60 in the war:

The M-60 Patton tank in World War III


The M-60 Patton tank was, at the time of the outbreak of the Third World War, still the primary main battle tank of the U.S. Army and Marine Corps, as well as National Guard and Reserve units, though the M-48 was still in Reserve service. Though being replaced by the M-1 Abrams in 1985, the M-60 served throughout the war, and is still in service (in the M-60A4 variant) in National Guard and Army Reserve units today. This work will cover those variants that saw service during the war and after:

M-60A1: Initial main production version with IR/White light searchlight, and M68 105-mm main gun. U.S. Army versions upgraded to M-60A3 standard. USMC M-60A1 RISE Passive version fitted with improved night vision equipment and reactive armor. USMC versions replaced by M-60A4 version during the war, with the M-1A1 replacing all USMC M-60s in the 1990s.

M-60A2: “Starship” version fitted with 152-mm gun/missile launcher for the Shillelagh missile. All converted to either M-60A3 standard or to bridgelayer vehicles.

M-60A3: Primary U.S. Army version during the war. TTS version began entering service in 1980. Thermal sight, laser rangefinder, and ballistic computer as standard. Production continued during the war, though secondary to the M-1 and M-1A1.. Reactive armor added to U.S. Army vehicles, and those in service with both the ROK Expeditionary Force and the Taiwanese 1st Mechanized Division. Most survivors converted postwar either to M-60A4 standard or to bridgelayers.

M-60A4: Final version for both U.S. Army and USMC. M-60A4-105 fitted with same turret as the M-1 Abrams with the standard 105-mm gun. M-60A4-120 fitted with same 120-mm gun as used on the M-1A1. Introduced 1987 for baseline version, early 1989 for the 120-mm armed version. Largely out of service by 2010, but some saw combat in the Baja War.

M-60AVLB: Bridgelayer version with a 60-foot scissors bridge.

M-60MCLIC: Modified AVLB fitted with two MCLC (Mine Clearing Line Charge) launchers in place of scissors bridge.

M-728 CEV: Combat Engineer Vehicle with A-frame and 165-mm demolition gun used for bunker-busting and for urban warfare.

Wartime Users:

U.S. (Army, Marine Corps)

South Korea: ROK units with M-48 transitioned to the M-60A3 prior to being committed to combat. ROK purchased surplus M-60A3s to convert to A4 standard postwar.

Taiwan: Primary tank for the ROC 1st Mechanized Division serving with U.S. Sixth Army.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Poohbah
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Fact File: the M-60 Patton

Post by Poohbah »

Astonishingly enough, Sierra Army Depot had M60A2s. Which they promptly shipped down to Camp Pendleton for Fifth Tanks.

Fifth Tanks was less than thrilled.
Matt Wiser
Posts: 1140
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: Fact File: the M-60 Patton

Post by Matt Wiser »

Poohbah wrote: Sat Jan 07, 2023 4:10 am Astonishingly enough, Sierra Army Depot had M60A2s. Which they promptly shipped down to Camp Pendleton for Fifth Tanks.

Fifth Tanks was less than thrilled.
And that was probably a gross understatement!
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Poohbah
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Fact File: the M-60 Patton

Post by Poohbah »

Matt Wiser wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 4:11 am
Poohbah wrote: Sat Jan 07, 2023 4:10 am Astonishingly enough, Sierra Army Depot had M60A2s. Which they promptly shipped down to Camp Pendleton for Fifth Tanks.

Fifth Tanks was less than thrilled.
And that was probably a gross understatement!
We thought the battalion Master Gunner and the maintenance chief were going rage-stroke right there in the Camp Margarita motor pool when the first transporters rolled up.
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 1168
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Fact File: the M-60 Patton

Post by Bernard Woolley »

I'm surprised in a way that the M60A4-120 was not designtated the M60A5.
“Frankly, I had enjoyed the war… and why do people want peace if the war is so much fun?” - Lieutenant General Sir Adrian Carton de Wiart
Poohbah
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Fact File: the M-60 Patton

Post by Poohbah »

Bernard Woolley wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 5:54 pm I'm surprised in a way that the M60A4-120 was not designtated the M60A5.
Well, part of it was that the 120mm version was never actually type certified by TACOM. The paperwork sat in an assistant deputy program manager's inbox at Detroit Arsenal until they retired in 1996, and by then it would have been too expensive to redo all of the documentation for a vehicle that was slated to be retired by the end of the decade.

It's discussed in classes at the Defense Acquisition University as an example of what they call "managing peripheral cost" versus a system's remaining life cycle.
Post Reply