'Freedom to transact' literally became a matter of life or death. This is our story.

[jemhouston]

Found this from a site I visit.

https://twitter.com/intrepid_p/status/1 ... 6329565586

Don’t miss what’s happening
People on X are the first to know.
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Hexagon profile picture
Intrepid
@intrepid_p
My small family spent two years of our lives essentially stateless, stranded at sea, 18,000km from home, floating on 40ft of fiberglass. 'Freedom to transact' literally became a matter of life or death. This is our story.

Australia locked its citizens out from returning during the pandemic. My family (wife and three kids 3, 5 and 6 months old) were sailing on a catamaran in the eastern Caribbean at the time. We ended up there for two years waiting out the pandemic.

When the pandemic hit, we essentially became stateless. For a time, all countries within sailing distance closed their borders to Australian-flagged vessels. No flights or cruise ships. My son couldn't renew his passport, and we had to get him temporary (refugee) papers.

Initially, we got locked down for 91 days on our boat in an overseas territory of France. The gendarme nautique (water police) prohibited us from leaving the boat. We technically weren't even allowed to swim off the boat at anchor.

Early on, desperate to get the kids some exercise, we took the dinghy to an isolated beach. The gendarme came with guns and megaphones to enforce our isolation. The next day, a mini aircraft carrier arrived, and military control was implemented on the island.

Hurricane season arrived while we were still in lockdown, ramping up the stress. We provisioned to head to sea if a hurricane approached; stateless, the last resort plan was to drift at sea, waiting out the season. I studied the weather manically.

Months passed, hurricanes became imminent, the outlook dire; then Grenada saved us. They let 1,200 stranded boats in, despite their borders being completely shut. A tiny poor country was saving us when my own affluent country was blocking its citizens. This hit home hard.

We sailed 3 days non-stop to Grenada. Too late in the season, we faced terrible weather, experiencing multiple frontal systems, winds of 30-40+ knots, and at one point, three tornadic waterspouts closed in around us while the gooseneck bolt on the boom vibrated loose.

Two more weeks of quarantine, then freedom after 4 months restricted to the boat. NOAA then issued a hurricane warning with a track map directly over us. We scrambled to prepare and tie to the mangroves. Thankfully, it fizzled out and passed just south of us.

As time went by, we became forgotten citizens. 'Freedom to Transact' issues began to arise. We had been living in Canada for the 3 years prior on global expert visas. Canada had also locked us out (it remained open to citizens & PR but not to work visa holders).

Our Canadian bank cards expired, and we needed to physically be in Canada to activate new ones. Subsequently, our online banking account was suspended for suspicious activity. Again, we were required to go into a branch to remedy, which was impossible.

Our Australian bank access also became restricted. After roaming overseas for too long, our Australian phone SIMs expired, and we lost access to our 2FA numbers needed for access to our bank accounts there.

To obtain a new SIM, we needed to provide government-approved ID and activate from within Australia. Again, the familiar response was 'come into the bank and we can sort this out'. Loss of freedom of movement essentially led to a loss of freedom to transact.

Fortunately, we had access to family who could help us out, and the bank agreed, after much pleading over the phone, to accept a phone number of a family member for 2FA. But the lesson was clear: without Freedom to Transact, you have very limited options to sustain life.

The Australian government had also placed a Level 4 travel ban on the entire world for its citizens, previously reserved only for war zones. This immediately rendered both our travel and health insurance policies void due to exemption clauses for travel to Level 4 areas.

The Panama Canal then shut to vessels under 80ft. And so began two, often stressful, years at sea, 18,000km from home, reliant on the benevolence of small foreign countries to provide the very shelter that our own country refused to render.

In this crazy chapter of our lives, we faced numerous challenges, yet savored incredible family experiences. Chiseled by the stress, we entered a heightened state of existence, ultimately transforming it into the most extraordinary time of our lives.

Navigating through immense technical and geopolitical intricacies, we journeyed using little more than wind across 15 countries & territories during the pandemic. With the absence of cruise ships/flights, the Caribbean's remote tranquility echoed the serenity of the 1950s.

Sailing into endless sunsets, dolphins playfully surfed our bow's wake, as the stars emerged in the evening sky. We saw numerous volcanic islands materialize on the horizon and explored untouched jungles and secluded waterfalls.

We spent time with the kids wildlife spotting for monkeys, iguanas, bird colonies. Exploring volcanic landscapes, relaxing in hot springs. Swimming and diving over the reef with turtles and schools of fish. Just enjoying the sea and each other as we watch the kids grow up.

Endless hours at the beach meeting other stranded families from all over the world with vastly different backgrounds but ultimately a shared story. A common experience to bond us together.

We ran our own renewable power systems; solar and wind into a lithium bank. We made our own water via a small desalination unit, caught our own fish. Drank rum punch and watched the green flash from more remote beaches than one could expect to see in tens of lifetimes.

Not all roses obviously. The flip side was the challenges of raising a baby girl and two boys including doing home school in a confined space. Coming up to speed under duress as landlubbers with the realities of sailing, navigation, weather routing, and all boat systems.

Constantly working on the seemingly infinite list of boat maintenance jobs. Endless time spent provisioning and looking for parts. Fitting in the time to work remotely to keep us alive financially. Dragging anchor in midnight squalls, having other boats drag around you.

Enduring sleep deprivation from anchor alarms and a breastfeeding infant, we somehow persevered on multi-day sails without access to additional crew, testing our limits. We then faced extended lockdowns and quarantines everywhere upon arrival.

The mental angst of that initial 91 days of lockdown in the hurricane belt hoping that boarders would open somewhere for Australian flagged vessels before the hurricane season started will be with me for life. Certainly the hardest thing we have done as a family.

The 18 months that followed was a sublimely beautiful yet at times crushingly difficult; in hindsight the most meaningful time in our lives. When we finally made it home to Australia after two years floating on 40ft of fiberglass, it felt like an alternate reality.

People at home stressing about the smallest of issues and arguing over trivial things. The Australia I left, a nation of prolific travellers, was now scared of foreigners in a way I had never thought possible in my life. Something had been lost in the population here.

They had their own lockdown trauma. In a bizarre way being stranded at sea liberated us from it. Forged by circumstance, intermeshed into the physical world around us, our preconceived boundaries of what was possible in life physically and emotionally had been removed.

Yet in other ways it led to a kind of PTSD reintegrating into society. Everyone took for granted simple freedoms like freedom of movement, freedom to always be able to return to your home country, and freedom to transact. We knew first hand how fragile it all was.

I held back releasing ocean work or even this story as I needed time to process the experience. After two years of being back on land I created the Intrepid Ocean series to attempt to work though these thoughts and emotions.

The experience highlighted the fragility of the global norms and governance systems we take for granted. Now after three years back in Australia we are heading back to our boat in the Caribbean to finish what we started. The kids are now 4,8,10. So here we are again on the precipice about to jump off. To find out who we truly are, as individuals, as a family.

[Nik_SpeakerToCats]

Onion Ninjas...

Plus yet another tranche of examples that too few people, never mind critical system administrators, are capable of 'Joined-Up Thinking' when situation changes...

IIRC, the Covid-response investigation running in London is revealing 'Utterly Effin' Hapless' as default response. IIRC, there was a generic pandemic plan available, something routinely refreshed / war-gamed against the chance of 'Spanish Flu 2.0' or CBW, but no-one seemed aware of its existence. BoJo's off-loading of folk who'd dared to query his notions had 'locked out' too much 'institutional knowledge'...

[kdahm]

Which explains why there should be a Bureau of Sabotage, who's sole purpose is to remove impediments in the government that impede the function of the government working for the benefit of the people.

Also, why there should be exception handler who can take situations like this, declare that it is an exception, and declare the rules silly when applied to that particular case. Without creating precedent.

[jemhouston]

Which explains why there should be a Bureau of Sabotage, who's sole purpose is to remove impediments in the government that impede the function of the government working for the benefit of the people.

Also, why there should be exception handler who can take situations like this, declare that it is an exception, and declare the rules silly when applied to that particular case. Without creating precedent.

Kdahm, there is fine line which impedes the function of government and what keeps the government from being oppressive.

That line keeps moving.

[jemhouston]

Onion Ninjas...

Plus yet another tranche of examples that too few people, never mind critical system administrators, are capable of 'Joined-Up Thinking' when situation changes...

IIRC, the Covid-response investigation running in London is revealing 'Utterly Effin' Hapless' as default response. IIRC, there was a generic pandemic plan available, something routinely refreshed / war-gamed against the chance of 'Spanish Flu 2.0' or CBW, but no-one seemed aware of its existence. BoJo's off-loading of folk who'd dared to query his notions had 'locked out' too much 'institutional knowledge'...

Nik, I have a question and I'm not trying to be wise ass about it. I think in the US Fauci wanted lockdowns to cover his funding of the Wuhan lab. Any idea who in the UK was pushing the lockdowns?

[Johnnie Lyle]

Which explains why there should be a Bureau of Sabotage, who's sole purpose is to remove impediments in the government that impede the function of the government working for the benefit of the people.

Also, why there should be exception handler who can take situations like this, declare that it is an exception, and declare the rules silly when applied to that particular case. Without creating precedent.

Kdahm, there is fine line which impedes the function of government and what keeps the government from being oppressive.

That line keeps moving.

There’s also a big difference between a government that defaults to assisting its citizens in need, and one that doesn’t.

It’s less about policy than employee mindset - and government is entirely too full of people who are looking for a reason to say “no,” “not my problem” or “too much work.” Conversely, governments are most successful (both in achieving stated policy goals and getting reelected) when they default to “yes,” and “here’s how I can help.”

[jemhouston]

Which explains why there should be a Bureau of Sabotage, who's sole purpose is to remove impediments in the government that impede the function of the government working for the benefit of the people.

Also, why there should be exception handler who can take situations like this, declare that it is an exception, and declare the rules silly when applied to that particular case. Without creating precedent.

Kdahm, there is fine line which impedes the function of government and what keeps the government from being oppressive.

That line keeps moving.

There’s also a big difference between a government that defaults to assisting its citizens in need, and one that doesn’t.

It’s less about policy than employee mindset - and government is entirely too full of people who are looking for a reason to say “no,” “not my problem” or “too much work.” Conversely, governments are most successful (both in achieving stated policy goals and getting reelected) when they default to “yes,” and “here’s how I can help.”

Good policy is good politics. It almost means the government cares more about serving the people, not serving itself.

[Johnnie Lyle]

Yup. Not just good policy, but skilled employees who help people navigate the process.

But that requires work, vision, understanding and commitment - and too many politicians are just looking for the next office.

[Nik_SpeakerToCats]

"...who in the UK was pushing the lockdowns ?"

Initially, until enough was known about Covid transmissibility etc, 'social distancing' / self-quarantining was a reasonable precaution. It's worked for 'seasonal Flu' and umpteen lurgies mitigated by vaccination. Just need to buy the time to roll out 'jabs'.

Snag was, once the 'Wheels of Westminster' began to turn, they went wild, folk getting caught in the machinery, finding loop-holes, not stopping to think about unintended consequences etc etc...

Alas, there seems to have been no Newton_2.0, sheltering at home, to craft any wondrous theoretical break-through given ample time to think...

[kdahm]

Which explains why there should be a Bureau of Sabotage, who's sole purpose is to remove impediments in the government that impede the function of the government working for the benefit of the people.

Also, why there should be exception handler who can take situations like this, declare that it is an exception, and declare the rules silly when applied to that particular case. Without creating precedent.

Kdahm, there is fine line which impedes the function of government and what keeps the government from being oppressive.

That line keeps moving.

Which is why the people doing the exception granting, or the sabotage, have to be vigilant that they don't become part of the problem.

[Calder]

Nik, I have a question and I'm not trying to be wise ass about it. Any idea who in the UK was pushing the lockdowns?

Lockdowns were enacted because historically they have been the most effective means of dealing with large-scale pandemics. (In the 1919 flu pandemic the cities\regions that enacted lockdowns on average recovered from the flu quicker and their economies recovered quicker.) The problem of course is that 2020 is not 1919. The speed of travel now means you can be anywhere in the world in less than a day. Also, every person alive then would know someone who died from something. I am sure their fear of disease was much more acute than ours and thus they almost certainly got more compliance. There aren't going to be any antivaxxers in 1919.

I think in the US Fauci wanted lockdowns to cover his funding of the Wuhan lab.

You are going to have to explain this one as I can't follow your logic. Lockdowns to my mind would make it more likely people would discover the gain of function research not less. After all, you have pissed off a lot of people looking for someone to blame who now have even more time on their hands to do research into the topic. When you are trying to hide something you generally don't try to highlight the issue even more.

[jemhouston]

My logic is suspect. I think Fauci thought the lockdowns would kill the spread fast enough so nobody would look at why it happened. If anyone did, he thought, he could stop it.

As you said, everything just highlighted everything.

[Calder]

My logic is suspect. I think Fauci thought the lockdowns would kill the spread fast enough so nobody would look at why it happened. If anyone did, he thought, he could stop it.

Oh, ok that makes sense I can follow the logic of that.