Page 2 of 2

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2026 12:36 am
by jemhouston
As I said before, Enterprise killed my love of Star Trek. The Kelvin verse movies were a mixed bag. The first episode of Discovery didn't help.


They need to remove Kurtzman and let Star Trek rest. When they bring it back, they will need someone with vision.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2026 7:29 pm
by Bernard Woolley
Star Trek: Year One has been pitched as the sequel to SNW.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2026 7:30 pm
by Bernard Woolley
Star Trek: Year One has been pitched as the sequel to SNW.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2026 3:08 pm
by The_Lurker
Bernard Woolley wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 7:30 pm Star Trek: Year One has been pitched as the sequel to SNW.
I have mixed feelings about this. While I have a tenuous family connection to one of the SNW cast and naturally want to see him in work, I'm also wary about stepping on the toes of TOS.

That said, I'd cope with seeing the reality of Kirk and Mitchell's frienship to really hammer home how awful Gary Mitchell's fate was.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2026 3:23 am
by Poohbah
Bernard Woolley wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 7:30 pm Star Trek: Year One has been pitched as the sequel to SNW.
Done right--with an eye to following solidly established canon and with good stories--it would be great.

I have no confidence that Hollywood can consistently tell good stories at this point, and that's a darned shame.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 3:43 am
by Johnnie Lyle
Poohbah wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2026 3:23 am
Bernard Woolley wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 7:30 pm Star Trek: Year One has been pitched as the sequel to SNW.
Done right--with an eye to following solidly established canon and with good stories--it would be great.

I have no confidence that Hollywood can consistently tell good stories at this point, and that's a darned shame.
Yes and no.

There’s only a small window of Kirk’s command of ENTERPRISE that hasn’t been covered. As much as I love how Paul Wesley has portrayed Kirk, there just isn’t enough time before we get to TOS to make a viable TV show.

So even if Hollywood is what it was in the 1960s or even 1980s, there just isn’t enough storytelling room for a commercially viable TV series.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 11:15 am
by jemhouston
I read reports the set for Strange New World have been torn down.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 1:38 pm
by Johnnie Lyle
jemhouston wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 11:15 am I read reports the set for Strange New World have been torn down.
SNW, or Star Trek Academy?

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 4:51 pm
by Bernard Woolley
I read Academy.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 5:04 pm
by jemhouston
Johnnie Lyle wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 1:38 pm
jemhouston wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 11:15 am I read reports the set for Strange New World have been torn down.
SNW, or Star Trek Academy?
Both I think

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 6:28 pm
by Micael
jemhouston wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 5:04 pm
Johnnie Lyle wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 1:38 pm
jemhouston wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 11:15 am I read reports the set for Strange New World have been torn down.
SNW, or Star Trek Academy?
Both I think
Yeah that seems to be the case. Meanwhile it is also reported that Star Trek United, starring Scott Bakula as Federation president Archer, has quietly been picked up for production, although no official announcement has been made.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 6:41 pm
by Johnnie Lyle
jemhouston wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 5:04 pm
Johnnie Lyle wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 1:38 pm
jemhouston wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 11:15 am I read reports the set for Strange New World have been torn down.
SNW, or Star Trek Academy?
Both I think
They are placing the props and equipment for Star Trek Academy on auction IIRC next week, but no word on a SNW auction.

Re: Strange New Worlds

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 7:27 pm
by jemhouston