Page 1 of 1

Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 2:38 pm
by jemhouston
This should have been posted before Christmas.

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhu ... d-n2649570


Look, Die Hard is a Christmas movie. I know people say it isn’t, even though it takes place on Christmas Eve, there are running Christmas jokes and nearly every character who isn’t a terrorist or a jerk wishes another character a Merry Christmas. Those who say it is not are wrong. But this is not about that debate, as it is over, this is about the relationships between the characters (who aren’t terrorists).

I just have to say this at the jump: Holly McClane is a bad wife. That fact didn’t always jump out at me; I used to think she was just a wildly unlucky person who happened to be ensnared in two of the biggest pre-9/11 terrorist plots on US soil. Then I looked at her deeper.

Sure, she is unlucky. Only she and local LA television reporter Richard Thornburg, along with her husband John, were victims of both that assault on Nakatomi Tower and the terror plot to free captured drug lord General Ramon Esperanza from the Republic of Val Verde. That’s an exclusive club no one would want to be a member of.

More than that, however, Holly “Gennero” McClane is very lucky, actually. She has a dedicated husband – twice tempted to stray, once by the stewardess upon his arrival in LA and again by limo drive Argyle with a corporate account and the wild women of Hollywood. And again, two years later another airline employee tried to pick him up at Dulles Airport, and again he passed. (This is without even mentioning how he saved her life twice, without even a thought to his own safety or holding it over her head, and a large part of the city of New York.)

Yes, being married to an honest police officer is no walk in the park, but there is no way someone in Holly’s business world, someone like the cocaine-abusing Ellis (RIP), would have stayed loyal.

Recommended

FBI Decides to Punch Itself in the Face Again With This Update on the J6 Bomber
Matt Vespa

Did You Catch AllState's Horrific Commercial About the Nola Terror Attack During the Sugar Bowl?
Matt Vespa
Beyond John McClane taking his wedding vows seriously, he genuinely cares for his wife. We always see him making an effort – flying across the country, traversing holiday traffic to go to the airport, putting in the work to make the phone calls. We do not see the same from Holly.

What we do is someone who sets up a new life 3000 miles away from her husband, then drops his name “for professional purposes” without telling him. Who would humiliate someone they love to the point that they did not even know how to refer to their spouse or search for them in the corporate directory. No heads up whatsoever shows Holly was already checking out of their marriage.

Long after hope had been lost that Holly would come back to him, John still wears his wedding ring. Sad.

The Die Hard movies, at least the first three, are a testament to the dedication of one police officer to his wife and family, a commitment John McClane maintains long after his wife finally forsakes him after years from abuse and neglect. The other sequels are about a father’s love for his children, which leads audiences to conclude that he is still, deep down, in love with their mother, too, who has taken him for granted and abused him for years.

Even though he always survives and manages to protect his loved ones, John McClane is a tragic character who forever pines for the one thing he simply cannot get: the love of his wife.

Holly McClane, who likely legally switched back to Gennaro after the divorce (since she’d done it professionally beforehand), is an abusive woman who ultimately has no regard for the man who kept herself and her children alive against all odds.

Some might say that John had a drinking problem, but who wouldn’t after having to take dozens of lives while almost losing your own, on two separate occasions in two years? You’d think Holly, of all people, would understand that. Compassion is what’s needed, not judgement. But judgement is all she gives.

Hans Gruber, Simon Gruber, random corrupt military men, drug dealers, cyber criminals and Russian mobsters may all be terrorists on the surface of the Die Hard franchise, but the real villain was Holly Gennaro. John McClane deserved much better.

This column is dedicated to the memory of those who died in the assault on Nakatomi Tower, the crash of Windsor Flight 114, the attempted robbery of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, the crimes of Thomas Gabriel and the innocent lives lost in Russia in the attempted theft of more than $1 billion in uranium. A donation has been made in their name to The Human Fund: Money for People.

Derek Hunter is the host of a free daily podcast (subscribe!) and author of the book, Outrage, INC., which exposes how liberals use fear and hatred to manipulate the masses, and host of the weekly “Week in F*cking Review” podcast where the news is spoken about the way it deserves to be. Follow him on Twitter at @DerekAHunter.

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 4:17 pm
by Craiglxviii
Just be glad that the Yautja didn’t follow from Val Verde.

:o :o maybe it DID.

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 9:08 pm
by jemhouston
Craiglxviii wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 4:17 pm Just be glad that the Yautja didn’t follow from Val Verde.

:o :o maybe it DID.
It did show up in LA, but it hunts in hot areas, so winter they should be safe.

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 10:16 pm
by Nathan45
Of course, there is also that rumor that they showed up in Antarctica in 2004, but nothing about that story made much sense, so best to disregard it...

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 10:32 pm
by kdahm
Nathan45 wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 10:16 pm Of course, there is also that rumor that they showed up in Antarctica in 2004, but nothing about that story made much sense, so best to disregard it...
They're too busy jockeying for positions in Trump's administration right now anyway.

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2025 11:05 pm
by Craiglxviii
Nathan45 wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2025 10:16 pm Of course, there is also that rumor that they showed up in Antarctica in 2004, but nothing about that story made much sense, so best to disregard it...
I read that book too… and didn’t like it either.

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:35 am
by Simon Darkshade
I understand that it is at least partially jocular, but I've never been able to fully 'get' the notion that Die Hard is a Christmas picture. From what I can gather, having never seen it, there is an awful lot of shooting, violence, swearing, explosions and more swearing, which really aren't in any traditional sense or spirit of Christmas, yet on account of the plot taking place on Christmas Eve or some such, it gets classified as a Christmas picture.

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 6:58 am
by Craiglxviii
Simon Darkshade wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:35 am I understand that it is at least partially jocular, but I've never been able to fully 'get' the notion that Die Hard is a Christmas picture. From what I can gather, having never seen it, there is an awful lot of shooting, violence, swearing, explosions and more swearing, which really aren't in any traditional sense or spirit of Christmas, yet on account of the plot taking place on Christmas Eve or some such, it gets classified as a Christmas picture.
… yes.

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:17 pm
by Belushi TD
Die Hard isn't just a Christmas movie, its a Harry Potter Christmas Movie.

As has been kicking around on the internet for years....

John McClain and Harry Potter both run around a tower at night avoiding Alan Rickman.

Belushi TD

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:51 pm
by Nathan45

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 4:56 pm
by kdahm
Belushi TD wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:17 pm Die Hard isn't just a Christmas movie, its a Harry Potter Christmas Movie.

As has been kicking around on the internet for years....

John McClain and Harry Potter both run around a tower at night avoiding Alan Rickman.

Belushi TD
To be more accurate, Harry Potter is a Young John McClain Christmas Movie. Potter came out much later, and is even dated after Die Hard.

But yes, avoiding Alan Rickman at night in a tower....

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 2:53 am
by Drunknsubmrnr
kdahm wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 4:56 pm
Belushi TD wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:17 pm Die Hard isn't just a Christmas movie, its a Harry Potter Christmas Movie.

As has been kicking around on the internet for years....

John McClain and Harry Potter both run around a tower at night avoiding Alan Rickman.

Belushi TD
To be more accurate, Harry Potter is a Young John McClain Christmas Movie. Potter came out much later, and is even dated after Die Hard.

But yes, avoiding Alan Rickman at night in a tower....
If that’s the criteria, what about Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves?

Re: Taking Another Look At ‘Die Hard’

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:16 am
by Poohbah
Drunknsubmrnr wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2025 2:53 am
kdahm wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 4:56 pm
Belushi TD wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:17 pm Die Hard isn't just a Christmas movie, its a Harry Potter Christmas Movie.

As has been kicking around on the internet for years....

John McClain and Harry Potter both run around a tower at night avoiding Alan Rickman.

Belushi TD
To be more accurate, Harry Potter is a Young John McClain Christmas Movie. Potter came out much later, and is even dated after Die Hard.

But yes, avoiding Alan Rickman at night in a tower....
If that’s the criteria, what about Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves?
"Call off Christmas."