Page 4 of 19

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Fri May 05, 2023 4:11 am
by James1978
Navy Considering Extending USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Past 2027
By: Sam LaGrone
May 3, 2023

The Navy is weighing if it will extend the life of USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) past its planned 2027 inactivation date, USNI News has learned.

While Ike is listed as departing the fleet just a year after USS Nimitz (CVN-68) as part the latest long-range shipbuilding plan, service officials are considering the viability of squeezing one more deployment out of the 46-year-old aircraft carrier before its planned inactivation, a defense official told USNI News.

The largest limiting factor will be the amount of nuclear fuel left in the carrier, USNI News understands. The carriers are planned to sail in the fleet for 50-years with a mid-life refueling and overhaul. The service keeps the exact level of fuel aboard each carrier secret.

In a statement to USNI News, the service said it considers Nimitz-class carrier life extensions on a hull-by-hull basis.

“The Navy carefully manages aircraft carrier inventory, including during the end-of-life process. The service life extension of the USS Nimitz allowed the Navy to get more service out of the first Nimitz-class carrier, proving the resilience and utility of that design, which will continue to serve in the fleet through the 2050s. Service life of carriers is managed on a hull-by-hull basis, and the Navy has multiple options for ensuring that carriers, when the reach their end-of-life, have a safe place to either begin, or wait to begin, the end-of-life process.”

The Navy elected to extend the older Nimitz for one more deployment. The carrier will undergo a five-and-a-half-month maintenance availability that will carry it into May 2026.

“Expected total cost of the yard period is $200M, currently requested in the budget. Projections supporting prior budget submissions had already accounted for the cost of a shorter, 60-day avail to enable operations out to the original retirement in April 2025, so supplementing the originally scheduled yard period to the appropriately scoped length of 5-1/2 months is an additional cost to the Navy of approximately $90M for the [service life extension],” reads the statement.

The possible life extension comes as the Navy is continuing to manage its Nimitz-class carrier force, which has been pushed hard in the last decade as the follow-on Ford-class entered the service later than anticipated.

On Tuesday, first-in-class USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) left on its first worldwide deployment six years after it commissioned in 2017.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Fri May 05, 2023 4:13 am
by James1978
Aircraft Carrier USS Gerald R. Ford Departs Norfolk for Worldwide Deployment
By: Aaron-Matthew Lariosa
May 2, 2023

The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group left Naval Station Norfolk on Tuesday afternoon for its first global deployment, USNI News has learned.

First-in-class USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) sailed down the James River into the Atlantic around 3:30 p.m., according to ship spotters.

The deployment of the Ford CSG will operationalize a new series of technologies aboard the carrier, commander Capt. Rick Burgess said in a statement.

“This ship and crew are actively reshaping the face of our Navy’s capabilities and strengthening the future of naval aviation,” he said.

The Navy has not specified the exact operating areas of the Ford CSG during its current deployment. Defense officials have told USNI News that Ford will continue the consistent carrier presence in the Mediterranean Sea, which the U.S. began in December 2021 ahead of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in early 2022.

“Our presence at sea throughout the deployment will provide reassurance to our allies and partners that sea lanes will remain open, and our joint operations will demonstrate our commitment to interoperability and maritime stability,” Rear Admiral Greg Huffman, the commander of Carrier Strike Group 12, said in a Navy news release.

The deployment of Ford, its escorts and the soon-to-be embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 8 comes almost six years after the carrier’s commissioning.

Burgess highlighted the training in the lead-up to this deployment. Last month, the Ford CSG finished its composite training unit exercise (COMPTUEX), which prepared the carrier, its escorts, and air wing for the deployment. USNI News visited Ford during the month-long COMPTUEX that certified the strike group for national tasking.

Staff and units of CSG 12, CVW 8, and Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 2 compose the Gerald R. Ford CSG.

Four ships – guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG-60) and guided-missile destroyers USS Ramage (DDG-61), USS McFaul (DDG-74), and USS Thomas Hudner (DDG-116) – will escort Ford. Those ships will depart from Naval Station Norfolk, Va., or Naval Station Mayport, Fla.

Many of the escorts and squadrons of the Ford CSG were underway with the carrier during an operational training cruise late last year. The CSG integrated with NATO partners in Exercise Silent Wolverine as part of the cruise.

Carrier Strike Group 12

Carrier

* USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), homeported at Norfolk, Virginia

Carrier Air Wing 8

Carrier Air Wing 8 (CVW 8), stationed at Naval Air Station Oceana, Va., will embark aboard Ford for the deployment and includes a total of nine squadrons.

* The “Ragin’ Bulls” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 37 – F/A-18F – from Naval Air Station Oceana
* The “Blacklions” of VFA 213 – F/A-18F – from Naval Air Station Oceana
* The “Golden Warriors” of VFA 87 – F/A-18F – from Naval Air Station Oceana
* The “Tomcatters” of VFA 31 – F/A-18F – from Naval Air Station Oceana
* The “Gray Wolves” of Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 142 – EA-18G – from Naval Air Station Whidbey Island
* The “Bear Aces” of Airborne Command and Control Squadron (VAW) 124 – E-2D – from Naval Air Station Norfolk
* The “Rawhides” of Fleet Logistics Support Squadron (VRC) 40 – C-2A – from Naval Air Station Norfolk
* The “Spartans” of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 70 – MH-60R – from Naval Air Station Jacksonville
* The “Tridents” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 9 – MH-60S – from Naval Air Station Norfolk

Cruiser

* USS Normandy (CG-60), homeported at Norfolk, Va.

Destroyer Squadron 2

* USS Ramage (DDG-61), homeported at Norfolk, Va.
* USS McFaul (DDG-74), homeported at Norfolk, Va.
* USS Thomas Hudner (DDG-116), homeported at Mayport, Fla.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Mon May 08, 2023 10:00 pm
by James1978
Navy doctors and dentists are told they owe 3 more years of service after military admits to another record-keeping error
Melissa Chan - NBC News
May 5, 2023

Dozens of military doctors and dentists preparing for retirement owe at least three more years of service because of record-keeping errors, the Navy said Friday — the second time in a week that military officials have publicly admitted to discovering administrative oversights that have derailed lives.

At least 65 dentists and physicians with the Navy Reserves have had three to four years of service erased from their records after an error was discovered in how their retirement credits had been calculated, the Navy said. Navy Reserve dentists and doctors provide care to members of any branch of service and their family members.

Four affected physicians and dentists came forward with their plights, speaking to NBC News on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation, days after the Army acknowledged a similar administrative error affecting hundreds of aviation officers.

“They’re trying anyway possible to retain us, even if it is trying to strong-hand us,” one dentist said.

That dentist had invested $2 million in opening a private practice in anticipation of retiring this summer. One of the physicians said he had sold his house and car to move overseas before learning he owed three more years.

“I feel like I’m trapped,” another doctor said. “It’s terrible. It’s unfair. It’s dishonorable.”

To retire with benefits, which kick in at age 60, members of the Reserves must accumulate at least 20 years of qualifying service.

For years, doctors and dentists who participated in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program were awarded up to four years in retirement credit if they went on to join the Selected Reserve — the military's primary source of backup manpower — after fulfilling their active duty service obligations.

The Army, Navy and Air Force used that credit as an incentive to retain health care workers, who were considered to be a “critical wartime shortage speciality,” according to a 2002 Army memorandum issuing guidance on the policy.

While the Army and Air Force confirmed it still allows doctors and dentists to use that credit toward retirement, those in the Navy Reserves started seeing that credit vanish from their records last year.

In January 2022, one physician’s record reflected that he had accumulated 19 years of qualifying service. Six months later, it went down to 16 years.

An official letter, sent by Navy Personnel Command last June and obtained by NBC News, said an "error was discovered" and a "review of all program participants’ records indicated that non-creditable time has been calculated as credible."

A "data migration issue" within the Navy Standard Integrated Personnel System "prematurely" awarded four years of service credit to officers, Cmdr. Rick Chernitzer, a Navy Personnel Command spokesperson, said in a statement to NBC News.

The error had previously allowed 95 people to retire before they were eligible, Chernitzer said.

The Navy said the affected medical professionals would still get credit for those years served — but only after they had reached the required 20 years, which weakens a much-needed incentive, the health care workers said.

One of the dentists said that there is no benefit to receiving credit after hitting the 20-year mark and that he would not have taken the offer had he known.

“The four years was offered as a recruiting incentive, and to blame a migration error is a bold-faced lie,” he said.

A 2020 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, which looked into retention issues, found that military physicians and dentists are generally paid less than those in the private sector.

Compensation also factors into why Army aviation officers favor becoming pilots for major airlines over staying in the military, several officers said.

Many affected physicians, dentists and aviators believe retention challenges across the military may be leading branches to reinterpret retirement and separation policies.

In a phone call with reporters last Thursday, Army officials said more than 600 aviation officers are being held to another three years of service after they noticed “errors” in the system a few months ago.

As part of a program known as BRADSO, cadets commissioning from the U.S. Military Academy or Army Cadet Command from 2008 and 2020 were able to request a branch of their choice, including aviation, by agreeing to serve an additional three years on active duty.

For years, the Army allowed some aviation officers to serve those three years concurrently, and not consecutively, along with their roughly contracted seven or eight years of service.

In letters the Army sent this month to the affected aviators as well as to members of Congress, it said it “realized” after conducting a “legal review of this policy” that the three-year BRADSO requirement has to be served separately.

The Defense Department did not immediately say whether any other branch or unit has been affected by record errors that are being corrected.

Meanwhile, those affected are scrambling to navigate their futures.

The physicians and dentists in the Navy Reserves are not bound by contracts and can leave if they want, but they would lose their retirement benefits, which include a pension and health care, so close to the finish line.

The dentist who started a private practice now worries about being tagged for deployment. If that happens, she said she would forgo her benefits rather than abandon her patients and employees for more than a year.

“I was trying to sail away into the sunset because I earned it,” she said.

Others said they are resigned to their fate and will stay because the retirement benefits outweigh their outrage.

“It’s a big carrot dangling in front of us to get that retirement,” a physician said.

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Mon May 08, 2023 10:02 pm
by James1978
Navy turns to drag to attract new recruits
by Stephanie Whiteside and Devan Markham
May 5, 2023

The U.S. Navy has received harsh criticism after appointing an active-duty drag queen to be a “digital ambassador” in a new effort to attract recruits as it is not expected to meet recruiting goals this year.

The military branch designated Yeoman 2nd Class Joshua Kelley as the first of five Navy Digital Ambassadors in a pilot program that ran from October to March, according to the New York Post.

Kelley, whose stage name is Harpy Daniels and who identifies as non-binary, joined the Navy in 2016 and said their experience as a sailor has “been a blessing.”

“This experience has brought me so much strength, courage and ambition to continue being an advocate and representation of queer sailors,” Kelley said in an Instagram post.

However, this move by the Navy has received major backlash, some even comparing it to Bud Light’s advertisement partnership with TikTok creator Dylan Mulvaney.

Former Navy SEAL Robert J. O’Neill, who was part of the team that killed Osama bin Laden, tweeted: “Alright, the U.S. Navy is now using an enlisted sailor Drag Queen as a recruiter. Im done. China is going to destroy us. YOU GOT THIS NAVY. I cant believe I fought for this bullshit.”

These responses come at a time when trans issues, such as gender-affirming care. are being debated across the country. According to a website that tracks such legislation, there were 492 anti-trans bills introduced across the country so far in 2023, with 422 labeled as “active.”

Much of that legislation specifically targets gender-affirming care for minors. Trans youth face much higher rates of suicide than their cisgender peers, and research has shown access to gender-affirming care can reduce the risk of suicide by 73%.

The debate around trans issues has become an increasingly partisan one, with a majority of Republicans saying they think the U.S. has gone too far in accepting transgender people, while the majority of Democrats say society hasn’t gone far enough.

Age is also a critical factor, with young adults more likely to support acceptance of trans people.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Mon May 08, 2023 10:06 pm
by James1978
Senator Wicker Advocates For US Shipyard Act
John Konrad
May 4, 2023

Yesterday on the floor of Congress, Roger Wicker, the senior United States senator from Mississippi, addressed his fellow lawmakers about an issue that has been gnawing at the very fabric of our nation’s security: the shrinking size of the US Navy in the face of a growing Chinese naval force. With the weight of history on his shoulders, Wicker asked the Senate to pass the US Shipyard Act, a bold move to revitalize maritime infrastructure and regain the nation’s footing in the world’s waters.

Wicker paints a stark picture of the current state of the US Navy, contrasting it with China’s rapid growth. He cites an alarming report predicting that by the end of this decade, China will have a fleet of 440 warships while the US will have only 290. The Chinese fleet’s expansion poses a direct threat not only to the United States but also to our allies in the region, including Japan, the Philippines, and Taiwan.

It’s a sobering reminder that the nation’s security has always been closely tied to naval power. Victories in the American Revolution, a rise to global prominence in the 19th century, and triumphs in two World Wars all hinged on the US Navy’s ability to command the seas. The stakes are high, and the pressure on the US Navy to fix longstanding shipbuilding issues is immense.

In April 2021 he, along with colleagues, introduced an act to designate $21 billion for the Navy’s four public shipyards in Virginia, Maine, Hawaii, and Washington, $2 billion for major Navy private new construction shipyards, and $2 billion for Navy private repair shipyards.

Senator Wicker does not shy away from pointing out the failures of the current administration in meeting Congress’s requirements for a 355-ship fleet. He decries the “strategic pause” that has left our sailors ill-equipped and our ships in disrepair. Technicians cannibalize parts from other destroyers to keep the fleet afloat, while the once-mighty USS Connecticut and USS Boise languish in drydock for years on end.

But Senator Wicker believes there is hope. His US Shipyard Act proposed a $25 billion investment in maritime infrastructure, empowering our shipyards to build the future of the US Navy fleet. He calls for increased funding for submarine production, the addition of a second shipyard for Constellation-class frigate construction, and the acceleration of purchases of unmanned platforms and long-range munitions.

While details of the Shipyard Act have yet to fully emerge there are systemic issues with shipbuilding that have, so far, gone unaddressed by this bill. First and foremost is the fact that money spent via the US Navy often gets lost in NAVSEA program offices as they conduct studies and change requirements leading to cost overruns and delays. In what gCaptain has termed The Badger Problem, resources are squandered by well-meaning civil servants working at cross purposes. Not mentioned is the fact the only large government shipbuilding project near budget and schedule is the National Security Multi-Mission Vessels (NSMV) shipbuilding program run by the US Maritime Administration.

These new NSMV ships are close to meeting targets because the Navy stepped aside from the project, outsourcing a significant portion of the oversight and planning to a corporate entity, Tote Services, who in turn outsourced much of the project to Korean firms that have imported many supplies from overseas manufacturers.

Senator Wicker does not mention other critical Navy shortages like US Navy working ships and the 100+ ship shortage in oil tankers and sealift capacity. A shortage that is even more relevant today with the vulnerability of pipelines (as seen with the Nord Stream explosions) and the closure of Red Hill, the world’s largest underground fuel and ship bunker storage facility.

Also not addressed in this speech are the financial incentives. Under the current system, most shipbuilding subsidies flow do not flow through the US Navy (they are the customer) but through the US Maritime Administration – an organization run by the so-called Ghost Admiral and known for secrecy and failure. This organization is currently sitting on multiple LNG terminal permits that are critically needed to boost energy exports. Many banks and Wall Street funds refuse to lend to shipyards that accept MARAD money because of the lack of transparency – MARAD has not completed a basic shipyard survey required by many banks since 2004 – and paperwork delays.

If the money gets distributed to the US Navy directly you run into another problem, US Navy admirals do not understand Wall Street and are hesitant to learn about new financial engineering tools used by most large infrastructure funds today. This lack of knowledge leads shipyard to junk bond financing while more favorable lending terms flood overseas to China. At a recent navy conference, gCaptain interviewed several top leaders about the fire-sale of VT Halter Marine – a shipyard with billions in government contracts (including critical icebreakers) that had invested hundreds of millions in upgrades – for just $15 million.

These are just a few of the problems with throwing money at shipyards expecting results. That said the first step in recovery is admitting you have a problem. In his speech, Senator Wicker takes this brave first step, which stands in stark contrast to the Navy’s official position highlighted in the recent 60 minutes interview with the top US Navy Admiral Mike Gilday who said the US Navy is ready to meet any threat posed by China.

A Truman Committee For Shipbuilding
The Truman Committee of 1941 could provide the template for Seantor Wicker. Officially known as the Senate Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program, was a distinguished bipartisan United States Congressional investigative body led by Senator Harry S. Truman. Established in March 1941, the committee’s primary objective was to identify and rectify issues in US war production, such as waste, inefficiency, and war profiteering.

Regarded as one of the most successful government-led investigative endeavors in US history, the Truman Committee utilized an initial budget of $15,000, which was expanded to $360,000 over three years. Through its diligent efforts, the committee achieved remarkable results, saving an estimated $10-15 billion in military spending and, more importantly, the lives of thousands of American servicemen.

Conclusion
The urgency of this moment in history cannot be overstated. As Wicker reminds the nation, we are in our most dangerous national security moment since World War Two. He invokes the words of Winston Churchill, who once wrote that “the foundation of all our hopes and dreams was the immense shipbuilding program of the United States.” Today, the peace and security of the free world depend on our Navy once more.

In a world where the waves of change are relentless, the US Shipyard Act hopes to ensure America does not merely ride the waves but commands them. The seas may be vast and unforgiving, but with a revitalized Navy, the United States will sail on a rising tide, ready to face the challenges of the 21st century. But a check alone might not be enough to fix this problem.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Mon May 08, 2023 10:09 pm
by James1978
US Planning More ‘Robots at Sea’ In Middle East To Combat Iran
May 6, 2023
By Sam Dagher

(Bloomberg) –The US is trying to convince Middle East allies to add dozens more robot vessels around the Arabian Peninsula to better detect threats from countries like Iran, a move to protect waterways vital to global commerce and oil trade.

The US, which leads two international maritime coalitions out of Bahrain, wants to have more than 100 unmanned surface vehicles — sometimes called robots at sea — in operation by the end of the summer, Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, who commands the coalitions and the Bahrain-based Fifth Fleet, said in an interview. An initial target of 50 was met in February and the technology delivers a cost-effective and efficient way of deepening US partnerships, he said.

The plan is being carried out as Iran, emboldened by a China-brokered deal to re-establish relations with US ally Saudi Arabia, seized a seciond tanker in less than a week. The US Navy released footage of boats it said were owned by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps swarming the Panama-flagged oil tanker Niovi as it sailed through the Strait of Hormuz, between Iran and Oman.

In addition to Iran, the US is concerned about China’s efforts to expand military and security ties with Gulf Arab states, who have historically relied on the US for defense needs. China, the largest trading partner for most of those countries and the top buyer of crude oil from the region, already has a naval base in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa.

It’s only logical China would want military bases in the Middle East to be “closer to the action,” said John Schaus, a defense expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In March, China held joint naval drills with Iran and Russia in the Gulf Oman.

“You can’t compare a rudimentary exercise to the broad sophisticated integration with large partners that we are leading here,” said Cooper, referring to those drills. He described a US-led maritime exercise earlier this year as the largest in the region, involving 42 countries, 7,000 people, 35 ships and 30 USVs. It also included a mock patient transfer in a USV.

Bahrain Base
In an operations room at the Bahrain naval base packed with screens and computers, Captain Colin Corridan, commander of Task Force 59 which is responsible for deploying the new USVs, said a lot of the footage and information collected from the sea robots is synthesized by artificial intelligence to ease the burden on humans. The USVs are made by Canadian, Israeli and US companies, among others, and cost from $800,000 to $3 million. They range in size from slow-moving solar-powered buoys to large unmanned speed boats.

“They are just eyes on the water constantly sending signals,” said Corridan.

At an outdoor hangar displaying some of the USV models, Lieutenant Commander Jorge Lens from the Spanish navy and a member of Corridan’s task force says some unmanned vessels can stay out for months without the need to refuel and resupply — the record is 220 days in the Red Sea.

Julie Angus, co-founder of Canada’s Open Ocean Robotics which manufactures USVs, was among those who traveled to Bahrain in November to take part in a naval exercise. She has also touted the autonomous vessels’ potential in the field of marine conservation.

So far only Bahrain and Kuwait have publicly announced plans to buy USVs, according to Commander Tim Hawkins, a spokesperson for US and coalition naval forces in Bahrain. The Iran tanker seizures are precisely why the “more enhanced visibility” provided by USVs is critical to regional security and stability, he said in emailed comments.

Bilal Saab, director of the Defense and Security Program at the Washington-based Middle East Institute, warned the US faces an uphill battle convincing Gulf Arab states, who typically take large and expensive military gear, of the utility of these vessels. That said, USVs are exempt from the lengthy Foreign Military Sales process that Gulf countries often complain about.

“It’s mind-boggling, your entire economy and national survival depends on your export of oil yet you do not have the maritime capabilities to secure your waters, they have always relied on us,” said Saab.

The US military including the Navy must also contend with the narrative that its attention is turning away from the Middle East and Gulf Arab states have to think of security alternatives — including potential alliances with China and Russia.

Bahrain’s Undersecretary for Political Affairs Abdulla bin Ahmed al Khalifa said that while his own country is committed to its partnership, certain regional states are frustrated with the human-rights conditions often attached to US military sales. This is making them look elsewhere.

“It’s an open market,” he said in an interview.

–With assistance from Julius Domoney and Paul Richardson.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Wed May 10, 2023 11:42 pm
by James1978
Navy plans to mount hypersonic missiles on Zumwalt stealthy mega-destroyers

Hope Seck | May 5, 2023

The Navy’s trio of DDG-1000 Zumwalt mega-destroyers have been ships without a main weapon – or a clear mission – for years. But that may be about the change as the service gives them a leading role in its plans to integrate hypersonic weapons with the fleet.

In documents accompanying the Defense Department’s fiscal 2024 budget request, released in March, the Navy announced plans to buy eight Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) missiles to field onboard the Zumwalt. Next year’s budget calls for $341 million to buy the hypersonic rounds and another $901.1 million for research and development. Ultimately, the service wants to spend $3.6 billion – enough to buy about two Arleigh-Burke class destroyers or a quarter of an aircraft carrier – over the next five years to purchase 64 of the missiles, which it plans to mount on Virginia-class submarines as well.

An unarmed missile is test-fired from an Ohio-class U.S. Navy submarine. Photo by MCS1 Ronald Gutridge/U.S. Navy

The Navy plans to move fast. Its newly released plans call for the deployment of the first CPS missiles on the USS Zumwalt, the flagship of the class, in fiscal 2025. The third and last ship of the class, DDG-1002 USS Lyndon B. Johnson, which remains under construction, will be constructed and commissioned with the missiles already integrated.

For the Zumwalt program, which has endured a series of high-profile setbacks, the addition of hypersonic missiles could be the start of a redemption story.

Armed with an array of weapons, DDG-1000 will provide the Joint Force Commander with precision strike and volume fires, a budget justification document states. “Designed with sustainable payload, multi-spectral stealth and optimal manning, DDG 1000 will take the fight to the enemy with unprecedented striking power […] This naval surface hypersonic strike capability will be able to conduct independent forward deployed operations and prosecute deep-inland, time-critical, soft and medium-hardened targets in a contested environment. The CPS capability, combined with the low observable characteristics of the ZUMWALT platform, creates a uniquely lethal and survivable naval surface platform.”

As Sandboxx News reported earlier this year, major defense contractor Lockheed Martin Corp. has received a $2 billion contract from the Navy to deliver the CPS missiles, which are also being purchased by the Army. A Hypersonic Glide Vehicle weapon that employs a rocket booster to reach speeds in excess of Mach 5 – and potentially much, much faster – HGVs can travel on a flight path much closer to Earth than conventional ballistic missiles. The missiles’ expected range, 1,700 miles, is about half that of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). But the magic of hypersonic weapons is in their movement: they can maneuver unpredictably, changing course to hit a target or avoid a threat. Thus, they’re extremely difficult to intercept and pose a much greater threat to the enemy.

Last year, Sandboxx News reported on the promise hypersonic tech holds for the Zumwalt class. Built with sloping geometric hulls designed to appear on radar as much smaller commercial fishing boats, thus throwing off any enemy trackers, the ships were originally envisioned as a larger class. But amid cost overruns and delays, the Navy ultimately opted to buy just three. The class received another major blow in 2016 when the purchase of ammunition for its special 155mm Advanced Gun System main weapon was canceled due to the eye-watering ammunition cost of $800,000 per round. The first two ships of the class, the Zumwalt and the Michael Monsoor, were commissioned in 2016 and 2019 respectively. The Zumwalt completed its very first deployment, to the Pacific, last year.

But Jerry Hendrix, an analyst at the Sagamore Institute and retired Navy captain who spoke with Sandboxx News last year, said hypersonics make the Zumwalt “the answer to a question we didn’t know we had.” The advanced communication capabilities aboard the ship, berthing for 150 and stealthy profile make the ship formidable for insertion in regions with area-denial defenses, he said. All this could put the long-sidelined Zumwalts at the forefront of the future near-peer fight in the Pacific for which the Pentagon is now preparing.

According to budget documents, the Navy CPS program is now working to design a “common all up round” including a 34.5-inch two-stage booster and a thermal protection system. The Army and Navy will use the same missile body design, and the Army will be responsible for production, with plans to start fielding systems by the end of this fiscal year.

“The Navy will design, develop, and produce the missile booster, as well as integrate the missile booster with [the common hypersonic glide body],” documents state. “Each service will use the common hypersonic missile while developing individual weapon control systems and launchers tailored for launch from sea or land.”

Navy officials say installation of the missiles onboard the ships will happen during previously scheduled and upcoming Building Yard Modernization Periods, but doubts still remain about how the service plans to complete testing and development to meet its ambitious timeline.

A recently released document from the Defense Department’s Director of Operational Testing and Evaluation (DOT&E) shows that the Navy has four joint flight campaign testing evolutions planned over the next fiscal year “to develop and demonstrate a hypersonic, cold-gas launched missile system prototype capability” but noted that the first test, which took place last June, resulted in an “anomaly.” While that failure prevented some of the planned data collection, DOT&E stated that the Navy had determined what went wrong with the test and was getting ready for the second planned test, to take place at Cape Canaveral, Florida.

Navy leaders revealed last month that the second test, originally set for March 5, had to be scrubbed during a battery failure. The third test, according to DOT&E, will launch from the Army’s prototype transporter-erector-launcher “and provide a demonstration of launch capability for the Army’s [long-range hypersonic] Dark Eagle program.”

DOT&E cited concerns that the Navy may not be as far along in its testing plans as it should be at this point.

“The Navy has yet to identify test conditions and associated test resources that will be evaluated across the three CPS phases to adequately assess lethality and operational effectiveness in the threat-contested environment,” its evaluation document states. “The Navy is considering inclusion of the threat-contested environment in Phase 1 testing, but has yet to commit due to developmental test requirements. These data are necessary to validate and use model and simulation for operational testing, and delays in data collection could increase operational test cost in later CPS phases.”

With just two ships available for testing, finding the right windows to complete all necessary evaluations could be a significant challenge for the Navy. The Zumwalt class may have a new opportunity for redemption, but it’s definitely not out of the woods yet.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Wed May 10, 2023 11:43 pm
by James1978
Submarine Supply Chain Largest Barrier to Improving Virginia Attack Sub Schedule, Says Boykin
By: Sam LaGrone
May 8, 2023

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – Availability of parts, not people, is the largest barrier right now to catch up with the delays in constructing Virginia-class nuclear attack boats, company officials at submarine builder Newport News Shipbuilding told USNI News.

Based on the latest estimates from the Navy, Newport News and Electric Boat, industry is delivering 1.2 Virginia-class attack boats a year and won’t reach the two-boat-per-year cadence until 2028.

While work stoppages and worker attrition due to the COVID-19 pandemic have been cited as reasons for the delay in submarine production, availability of parts and materials has become the primary reason for delays, Newport News president Jennifer Boykin told USNI News on Friday.

“COVID had an impact because we had such a large percent of the workforce that wasn’t here during the six months in 2020. Many of our suppliers, if not most, were struggling with some of the same issues. Many of our suppliers got off track because they didn’t have [the] workforce,” she said on Friday, a day ahead of the christening of Massachusetts (SSN-798).
“Post COVID, not as many people came back … Most of our suppliers are really working, doing what they can to increase their workforce pipeline.”

While Newport News is doing well with the workforce for the moment, its suppliers are dealing with their own workforce issues that have increased the time it takes for parts to get to the yard.

Workforce and supply chain concerns have prompted the Navy, HII and General Dynamics Electric Boat to retool the schedule for the Block V Virginia-class.

“The intent was to incorporate some of these challenges,” Boykin said.

In March, USNI News reported that the Navy estimated it would take until 2028 for EB and Newport News to build two boats per year. In March, Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro stressed the delays to the Virginia program before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee.

“On the Virginia side of the house … they are significantly behind. They should be at two boats per year. … They have made some progress in moving in [the right] direction. I’m concerned particularly about the construction of the sterns and bows in Virginia and getting those up to Electric Boat up in Connecticut and integrating them all,” he said.
“We are holding industry accountable in every which way that we possibly can and working with them at the same time to try to close these gaps.”

Compounding the slip in the program schedule, the Navy is almost one year late in issuing advanced procurement contracts for the next two Virginia-class Block V attack boats. The impasse is over an insurance dispute between the submarine shipbuilders in the event of an accident occurring either during construction or operations aboard attack boats that field Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles.

Industry and service officials have told USNI News they are close to reaching an agreement to proceed on the next two boats, but the delay in procuring material has hurt the program.

Without addressing the insurance issue directly, Boykin renewed a call from industry for predictable funding for the program, particularly in procuring advanced materials.

“The suppliers clearly could have and would have started, a year or more ago if the funding had been there,” she told USNI News.
“The worst thing we can do as an enterprise is starve the beginning. That’s part of what we’re really working with the Navy on to get advanced funding to those suppliers who are already struggling with workforce.”

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Wed May 10, 2023 11:46 pm
by James1978
In a rare move, House Oversight lawmakers to hear from Navy program executives on shipbuilding
Rear Adm. Thomas Anderson and Rear Adm. Casey Moton are expected to testify on May 11 for a hearing likely to examine how the US is doing compared to China in producing ships.
By Justin Katz
May 05, 2023

WASHINGTON — A House Oversight subcommittee is seeking testimony directly from two Navy program executive officers for a hearing on naval shipbuilding next week, an unusual congressional move.

The two officers expected to testify on May 11 are Rear Adm. Thomas Anderson, PEO for ships, and Rear Adm. Casey Moton, PEO for unmanned and small combatants, according to a May 4 committee statement.

“According to senior leadership within the Navy, China currently has a massive advantage on the United States operationally when it comes to shipbuilding. Given the astronomical amount of U.S. taxpayer funding put towards this effort, that is unacceptable,” said Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-Wisc., the chairman for the national security, border and foreign affairs subcommittee.

Grothman is referring to statements from Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro, who has publicly acknowledged China’s shipbuilding capacity is overtaking the US.

“They have 13 shipyards, in some cases their shipyard has more capacity — one shipyard has more capacity than all of our shipyards combined. That presents a real threat,” he said in February, adding that it is difficult for the US shipbuilding industry to compete with a country using “slave labor.”

It’s an admission that has not sat well with lawmakers, particularly those who are keen to see the Navy’s fleet grow and have codified into a law a variety of requirements as to fleet size the Pentagon is supposed to meet, though those laws have generally lacked any penalty for the military if it fails to meet the standard.

The Oversight Committee has a broad jurisdiction — for perspective, statements about the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration and the US Attorney for the District of Columbia all neighbored the one about shipbuilding on the committee’s website — and it’s not unprecedented that PEOs testify directly to lawmakers, for instance, before the Armed Services subcommittees. But it is rare to see the Navy’s PEOs called to testify to an oversight subcommittee prompted by their boss’ comments.

Program executive officers in the military are charged with developing and building the military’s latest planes, ships and weaponry. They are often engineers by trade and have worked their way up the ladder through billets focused on project management.

In contrast to the more high-profile jobs of senior civilian leadership and service chiefs, the job of a PEO, like Anderson or Moton, is not to make decisions about how many ships the Navy should or will build, but rather ensure the programs directed by the brass are executed under cost and on schedule.

The Navy billet that is most attuned to the country’s private shipyards is the assistant secretary for research, development and acquisition, the senior executive to whom all the Navy’s PEOs report. The White House’s nominee for that job, Nickolas Guertin, remains stalled in the Senate’s confirmation process, according to Congress’ website that tracks nominees. The position, also called the “acquisition executive,” has remained filled by acting officials since Hondo Geurts became the service’s acting undersecretary in February 2021 and later exited the Pentagon in August of the same year.

In contrast to the Armed Services committees, whose leaders often tout the bipartisan nature of their work, the Oversight Committee often invites a much more charged partisan environment, meaning the Navy PEOs could be in for some rough waters.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Wed May 10, 2023 11:49 pm
by James1978
Criminal Inquiry into Red Hill Fuel Spills Ongoing
7 May 2023
The Honolulu Star-Advertiser | By Peter Boylan

The Navy captain who was in charge of the Fleet Logistics Center Pearl Harbor during the May 2021 Red Hill jet fuel spill is not a target of the U.S. Department of Justice's ongoing criminal investigation into the environmental disaster that affected about 93, 000 people, his attorney told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser.

Capt. Trent C. Kalp, 51, was in charge during the May 2021 fuel leak and was succeeded by Capt. Albert L. Hornyak on Aug. 6, 2021, before the November 2021 spill. Hornyak was removed of his command in April 2022 "due to a loss of confidence in his ability to perform his duties following a series of leadership and oversight failures at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility."

Hornyak raised concerns about the facility's safety in leaked emails obtained by the Star-Advertiser.

Kalp testified before the grand jury Dec. 8 and has not received a target letter from DOJ, according to his attorney, Victor J. Bakke.

"We received a letter requesting his appearance, and we voluntarily appeared, " said Bakke in an interview with the Star-Advertiser. "At this time, to our knowledge, we are not a target of the investigation."

Kalp is currently director of fleet supply.

The report on the spill prepared by the Navy's U.S. Pacific Fleet noted that Kalp removed military oversight of day-to-day operations at Red Hill just a few months prior to the May 2021 leak, causing a "significantly " increased risk at the facility.

It also found that he failed to "identify, mitigate, or directly address these risks, " oversaw an "alarming level of procedural non-compliance, " on May 6, 2021, and demonstrated an overall lack of critical thinking and leadership.

DOJ is in the midst of a federal grand jury investigation into the 2021 Red Hill fuel spill to determine whether criminal charges are warranted.

Civilian and U.S. Department of Defense officials in charge of Red Hill operations during the fuel leaks have been testifying before the panel.

Those officials include civilian contractors working at Red Hill at the time of the spills and Navy commanders like Kalp.

Sherri R. Eng, 56, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command environmental business line leader and Navy Region Hawaii environmental program manager, was also interviewed by the grand jury. Eng did not immediately reply to Star-Advertiser requests for comment.

Special agents with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Criminal Investigation Division and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service have been shepherding witnesses to the panel and supporting the grand jury's investigation for months.

Despite witnesses walking into and out of the U.S. District Courthouse in Honolulu en route to the proceedings and the high-profile nature of the spills that sickened thousands and threatened Oahu's aquifers, federal officials are saying nothing about the criminal probe.

"Out of respect for the investigative process, NCIS does not comment on or confirm details relating to ongoing investigations, " Jeff Houston, a spokesperson for NCIS Public Affairs in Washington, D.C., told the Star-Advertiser in a statement.

A spokesperson for the Navy's U.S. Pacific Fleet told the Star-Advertiser in a statement, "It would be inappropriate to comment on an ongoing criminal investigation."

The U.S. Department of Justice also declined to discuss the investigation into whether criminal charges are warranted.

"As a general matter, the department will neither confirm nor deny the existence of an ongoing investigation, " said Wyn Hornbuckle, deputy director of DOJ's Office of Public Affairs, in a statement to the Star-Advertiser.

The probe is being led by Krishna S. Dighe, senior counsel with DOJ's Environment and Natural Resources Division, which is tasked with enforcing "the Nation's civil and criminal environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and hazardous waste laws."

The water contamination affected roughly 93, 000 people, mainly military families. For months the state Department of Health issued an advisory that the water was unsafe to drink. Thousands of families relocated to hotel rooms or moved out of their housing as the Navy and regulators worked to make the water safe to drink. The all-clear was declared in March 2022, about four months after the jet fuel contamination was found.

In March 2022, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced the department would permanently shut down the Red Hill facility following the disaster. The decision came amid withering pressure from state officials, the Hawaii congressional delegation, protests and extensive community opposition to keeping the under ­-ground, World War II-era fuel facility in operation.

The management of the Red Hill fuel spills and the disclosures of information have eroded local trust in the Navy. Defueling of the Red Hill facility is projected to be completed in July 2024.------ Star-Advertiser staff writer Kevin Knodell contributed to this report.

___

(c)2023 The Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Thu May 11, 2023 6:28 pm
by OSCSSW
James1978 wrote: Mon May 08, 2023 10:02 pm
Navy turns to drag to attract new recruits
by Stephanie Whiteside and Devan Markham
May 5, 2023

The U.S. Navy has received harsh criticism after appointing an active-duty drag queen to be a “digital ambassador” in a new effort to attract recruits as it is not expected to meet recruiting goals this year.

Oh give me a break, will you?

The military branch designated Yeoman 2nd Class Joshua Kelley as the first of five Navy Digital Ambassadors in a pilot program that ran from October to March, according to the New York Post.
THING in US Navy Uniform that convinced the brain dead brass to inflict this insanity on the fleet should be charged , tried and convicted under Article 134, UCMJ, "conduct that is prejudicial to good order and discipline is conduct that causes a reasonably direct and palpable injury to good order and discipline; the acts in question must be directly prejudicial to good order and discipline, and not prejudicial only in a remote or indirect sense!
Is that clear enough to you morons who support this crap? If not you need a lobotomy YESTERDAY.


. . .

However, this move by the Navy has received major backlash, some even comparing it to Bud Light’s advertisement partnership with TikTok creator Dylan Mulvaney. The backlash is absolutely justified. Too bad we can't fire the morons responsible for this....or maybe we can by voting the WOKE A Holes who pressure the gutless brass to do this kind social engineering out of office.

Former Navy SEAL Robert J. O’Neill, who was part of the team that killed Osama bin Laden, tweeted: “Alright, the U.S. Navy is now using an enlisted sailor Drag Queen as a recruiter. Im done. China is going to destroy us. YOU GOT THIS NAVY. I cant believe I fought for this bullshit.”

I am no fanboy of all things SEAL. I think many of them have gone Hollywood. That said there is no way ion hell I could ever have survived Hell WeeK in my very best days.
BUT O’Neill has it right. Blind Hog theory once again looks like fact! :lol: :lol: :lol:


. . .

The debate around trans issues has become an increasingly partisan one, with a majority of Republicans saying they think the U.S. has gone too far in accepting transgender people, while the majority of Democrats say society hasn’t gone far enough.

Well I'm NO Republican, although they have done a lot less damage to MY Republic, MY Constitution, Me and Mine than the America hating DemoRATS have.

IMNSHO the U.S. has gone WAY too far in coddling INSANE People at the expense to the vast majority of us who know most of these people are so "F"ed up in the head they are the last Ones any vet would ever want to go In Harm's Way with. The USN, at War, is not a kindergarten/University :roll: infested/staffed by Moist academics and perpetual spoiled brat children who really know nothing of life and are persuaded by utterly screwed up POS from the media and sh!t bum politicians using them for power grabs that lead to a licence to steal
.

. . .


Age is also a critical factor, with young adults more likely to support acceptance of trans people.

Well the authors got that right. When of think about the absolutely incredibly stupid sh!t the kids pulled as we Lifers worked so damn hard to teach/train them to be responsible sailors I can't help laughing. They don't know a damn thing about life BUT under the right guidance 80% of them will become good, if not great sailors,5 to 10 % will at least do no real harm to the Nav or themselves, as long as we keep a close eye on them and keep them away from the things in the Nav that will kill you and the poor bastards around you in a heart beat if you screw with them. And then there are the others like this drag queen who are not only undesirable but outright really dangerous if around young, stupid sailors.

You folks that have not lived the military have no idea what I am talking about and you are so much better than the politicians in uniform, who down deep know this is a recipe for disaster who push this WOKE insanity on the fleet to please their political masters for their next star.

Anyone here have a problem with what I wrote? I could not care less.


Image

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Thu May 11, 2023 6:45 pm
by Nightwatch2
Heh

The antics that some of our young sailors could get themselves into never ceased to amaze me

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Thu May 11, 2023 7:07 pm
by Micael
Nightwatch2 wrote: Thu May 11, 2023 6:45 pm Heh

The antics that some of our young sailors could get themselves into never ceased to amaze me
Their point of view. ;)
https://twitter.com/ric_cole/status/165 ... JG_Vm2jjAA

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Thu May 11, 2023 9:54 pm
by Nightwatch2
Micael wrote: Thu May 11, 2023 7:07 pm
Nightwatch2 wrote: Thu May 11, 2023 6:45 pm Heh

The antics that some of our young sailors could get themselves into never ceased to amaze me
Their point of view. ;)
https://twitter.com/ric_cole/status/165 ... JG_Vm2jjAA
😁😂

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Thu May 11, 2023 10:02 pm
by Drunknsubmrnr
I think this is another non-issue. I never had a problem sailing with drag queens as long as they understood storing their wigs/shoes/etc was their problem.

FWIW they’re really good at paying attention to detail, and nobody is more offensive-minded than a pissed off drag queen. And they’re pissed off a LOT.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Tue May 16, 2023 2:11 am
by James1978
US Navy declares its mine countermeasures suite ready for operations
By Megan Eckstein
May 11, 2023

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy declared initial operational capability on its entire mine countermeasures mission package, which will operate off littoral combat ships and other potential motherships.

The mission package includes four primary systems to find, identify and destroy sea mines: the Airborne Laser Mine Detection System and the Airborne Mine Neutralization System, both of which are operated from MH-60 helicopters; and the Unmanned Influence Sweep System and the AN/AQS-20C mine-hunting sonar, both of which are towed behind the Mine Countermeasures Unmanned Surface Vessel.

Each of these systems underwent individual testing and IOC declarations, and the Navy on May 2 conferred that readiness grade on the entire family of systems.

The Navy has also been developing the Knifefish unmanned underwater vehicle as part of the mission package. Rear Adm. Casey Moton, the program executive officer for unmanned and small combatants, told reporters Thursday that a “Block 0″ version of the UUV was used in the mission package operational tests to ensure it could be launched, recovered and operated alongside the other unmanned systems; but the Navy will pause acquisition of this UUV as the service pursues improvements, a change revealed in the fiscal 2024 budget request.

The sea service completed its operational test and evaluation in August 2022 aboard Independence-variant littoral combat ship Cincinnati. Moton said this testing included 230 hours of mine-hunting operations with the MCM USV across 33 separate missions; 12 airborne sorties; the first-ever dual-USV operations, with one MCM USV towing the minesweep and the other towing the sonar; and a command-and-control demonstration using two MCM USVs and one Knifefish.

In the nine months since, Moton said the Navy has been pouring over the data, identifying any remaining performance or reliability problems in the equipment, and either fixing them or mapping out detailed plans to fix them before a first operational deployment.

Moton said the Navy planned to deploy the first LCS with the mine countermeasure package in fiscal 2025. Once the fleet has sufficient capacity, Navy and Defense Department leaders will certify that the LCS mission package is capable enough to handle all of the service’s mine countermeasures needs, and the Navy will begin to retire the aging Avenger-class MCM ships and MH-53 helicopters that today provide MCM capability to fleet commanders overseas.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Tue May 16, 2023 2:14 am
by James1978
Navy links uncrewed air, sea tech to solve Integrated Battle Problem
By Colin Demarest
May 11, 2023

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy tested what one commander described as a combination of “unmanned and unmanned” sea and air capabilities in a Pacific Fleet demonstration known as Integrated Battle Problem 23.1.

During the exercise, which began May 1 off the coast of California and runs through Friday, a V-BAT drone made by Shield AI was launched from a Leidos Seahawk medium displacement unmanned surface vessel, according to Cmdr. Jerry Daley, the leader of Unmanned Surface Vessel Division One.

IBP 23.1 “gave operators more of a hands-on experience with a longer list and more-diverse list of unmanned systems at sea and in a combat environment,” Daley told reporters May 11. “It was predominantly, if not exclusively, all unmanned systems for this event, which is a little bit different, in contrast from IBP 21, where it was more manned and unmanned.”

The latest trials, he added, represent the “next step in the progression of integrating unmanned systems into fleet operations across the continuum, under the sea, on the surface and in the air.”

Competition between the U.S. and China is pushing the spotlight onto naval supremacy, especially in the Indo-Pacific. The vast region, home to more than half the world’s population and some of its largest ports, is considered by the Biden administration to be critical to U.S. interests.

The Navy is banking on uncrewed technologies to beef up its presence, whether that’s overall size and international distribution or with specific capabilities, such as surveillance, targeting and jamming. A recent update to the chief of naval operations’ Navigation Plan, a strategic-vision-style document, included an outline of a fleet comprising about 373 manned ships and 150 uncrewed vessels, Defense News reported.

Integrated Battle Problem, now in its second iteration, allows the Pacific Fleet to evaluate uncrewed machinery and discover their best applications, Daley said. Among other assets tested were the Sea Hunter medium displacement unmanned surface vessel and the RQ-20 Puma drone.

The first IBP exercise was held in 2021. At the time, the Navy said uncrewed developments were “game-changers” and were motivating a “rethink” of how the service and sailors execute their tasks.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Tue May 16, 2023 2:17 am
by James1978
Navy, Shipyards Settle Dispute that Delayed Submarine Orders
It’s unclear how the sides came to agreement, or just how late the two Virginia-class subs will eventually arrive.

By Marcus Weisgerber
May 11, 2023

The U.S. Navy has settled an insurance dispute with two key shipbuilding companies that has delayed the ordering of two Virginia-class submarines, according to people familiar with the matter.

The dispute centered on who should pay if a Tomahawk cruise missile were to accidentally explode during construction, damaging or destroying a nuclear-powered submarine worth more than $3 billion. For years, the Navy had indemnified the yards—Electric Boat, which is owned by General Dynamics, and Newport News Shipbuilding, a division of HII—essentially providing the insurance that the yards found difficult to obtain from a private insurer.

But in 2018, the Navy decided the arrangement heaped too much risk on the service, and ceased to offer indemnification. The service asked the shipyards to find private insurance, but they declined. In February 2022, the Navy suspended plans to order long-lead parts for two Virginia-class attack submarines. “Under the current law, Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro makes the final decision on indemnification for Navy and Marine Corps contracts,” USNI News wrote in December.

In January, Del Toro urged the companies to come to the table and negotiate.

“I’m going to hold the ground and I’m willing to compromise on some things,” Del Toro said. “I’m not willing to compromise on everything. They’re going to have to come to the table with reasonable language that the American taxpayer can accommodate on that ground.”

Congress as well expressed worry about the impending delays to the delivery of the planned submarines, and alluded to the dispute in the 2023 defense policy bill. This all comes as companies are trying to quell supply issues caused by the pandemic and hire workers.

Last week, Newport News Shipbuilding President Jennifer Boykin said delays in long-lead parts typically produce delays in sending the submarines to the fleet.

“In order for the assembly line to get healthy and to begin to increase the rate, the worst thing we can do as an enterprise is starve the beginning” of the supply chain,” Boykin said May 5. “That's part of what we're really working with the Navy on—to get advanced funding to those suppliers who are already struggling with workforce, etcetera, is key if we're going to, in two or three or five years later, actually increase our throughput rate. When you start the beginning, because the end is not coming out, you're not going to change the scenario.”

On Thursday, a Navy official said a deal had been agreed upon by the Navy and the shipyards.

“We have reached agreements with the companies that are involved here,” said the Navy official, speaking anonymously because the contracts for the sub parts had not yet been awarded.

The official declined to say what the deal entailed or whether the subs’ delivery would be delayed.

Both companies declined to comment before the contracts were awarded.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Tue May 16, 2023 2:22 am
by James1978
The Silent Service no more? Pacific submarine fleet a key part of Pacific deterrence
Rear Adm. Jeffrey Jablon, the Submarine Force, US Pacific Fleet (SUBPAC) commander, talks with author Robbin Laird about his view of pacific deterrence.
By Robbin Laird
May 12, 2023

I have just returned from a five week visit to Australia and to Hawaii. During that visit, I had the chance to talk with US and Australian officers about the challenge of deterring the Chinese in the Pacific —not forgetting the other two nations threatening Western interests, namely the Russians and the North Koreans.

The salience of submarines to Australian deterrence and their contribution to allied deterrence was evident with the AUKUS announcement of the Australian government’s decision to acquire nuclear submarines to replace their aging diesel Collins-Class submarines.

In a presentation to the Williams Foundation, Vice Admiral Mead, the key ADF officer involved in working the submarine program with the United States and the United Kingdom, emphasized that his Navy had not done as good of a job explaining the impact of the submarine decision on Australia’s deterrence capabilities as they needed to do.

When I got to Hawaii, I had a chance to meet with Rear Adm. Jeffrey Jablon, the Submarine Force, US Pacific Fleet (SUBPAC) commander who provided a robust discussion of the role of submarines in the evolving deterrent approach of the United States and its allies in the Pacific.

As he put it: “I would no longer characterize ourselves as a silent service. Deterrence is a major mission for the submarine force. You can’t have a credible deterrent without communicating your capabilities; if the adversary doesn’t know anything about that specific deterrent, it’s not a deterrent.”

To illustrate the importance of communicating these capabilities, Jablon told me that as we spoke, there were 18 submarines underway in the Pacific Ocean. Of these, seven were operating west of the international dateline.

It’s not hard to see ways in which the service is trying to create deterrence through signaling.

In recent years the Navy has begun demonstrating visibly its presence in various ways, such as SSBN port visits. At the same time as my visit to Pearl Harbor, the Navy had released photos of the ballistic missile submarine USS Maine (SSBN 741) visiting Guam, and a joint meeting of the leaders of the US and South Korea came with the announcement of future submarine port visits to the ROK Port visits and pursuing diverse locations from which to resupply the force are increasingly important, especially in times of conflict.

In addition, the Navy is stepping up its cooperation with allied and partner submarine forces, as illustrated by Jablon recently hosting the Submarine Warfare Commanders Conference. This was a core meeting with other submarine commanders from Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Australia, Canada, France, and the United Kingdom. As he underscored: “During the conference, the submarine force commanders discussed the coalition approach to interoperability, which is a key part of deterrence.”

Jablon underscored that they were stepping up exercises with allies in common ASW and USW operations. For example, he mentioned a recent exercise with South Korea and Japan in working joint capabilities. It’s another example of how Chinese actions in the region are driving countries together in the Pacific and providing new opportunities for the US Navy to work with those allies.

Of course, there is the less-public — and more pointy — end of the deterrent stick. There are a number of ongoing developments that need to be highlighted to understand exactly how the US views its submarine force and its evolution.

It must be understood that the submarine force can operate separately or work with the joint force to provide joint force solutions. As the joint force works enhanced kill web capabilities, what Ed Timperlake and I have previously defined as ”combat clusters” can operate together to deliver joint fires or, in other words, very different types of platforms can come together to create a joint effect.

In addition, the submarine force is adding autonomous systems capabilities. Jablon specifically mentioned two. The first is the ability to operate a UUV out of a torpedo tube, with the UUV coming back after its mission to offload data specifically onboard the submarine. The second is the ability to launch a UAV from a submerged submarine to enable joint fires. He said that the submarine force has specifically worked with the USMC in their development of the Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO) solution set.

Finally, the joint force, including the submarine force, are developing new ways to do expeditionary logistics to enable resupply of the force when operating in a contested environment. For food or critical parts, an Osprey has been tested to provide vertical replenishment. For weapons, the submarine tenders have been working to resupply submarines who operate from various bases in the region to conduct the rearm mission. Obviously, the command element would work submarine operations in such a way that a cascading approach to weapons resupply would be worked in times of conflict.

As Jablon concluded, “The submarine force is now becoming part of the ‘combat clusters’ that you’re talking about instead of an independent operator. In the Cold War, we operated independently, alone, and unafraid. During the land wars, we started becoming part of the joint force as we provided land fires via the TLAM. Now, we are fully integrated with the joint force in terms of targeting and communications. But, of course, we can also conduct independent operations as the ‘silent service’ when directed.”

So, a less silent service — but one that still recalls its core function.

Re: US Navy News

Posted: Wed May 17, 2023 3:40 am
by James1978
No one knew a US aircraft carrier water tank had jet fuel in it until the unaware crew hooked it up to the drinking water system, Navy report says
Jake Epstein
May 16, 2023

* The Navy acknowledged that it found jet fuel in the drinking water aboard the carrier USS Nimitz.

* Sailors previously told Insider that the situation was far worse than what the service initially revealed.

* A new investigation says that no one realized a water tank was polluted with jet fuel for more than a year.

An unused water tank on a US Navy aircraft carrier was polluted with jet fuel for at least 17 months before anyone realized it, a newly released investigation said. The crew found out when they connected it to the drinking water system.

As water with an unusual odor came out of the drinking fountains late last summer, the problem started to become clear, but even then, some weren't completely aware of the severity of the problem.

This week, the Navy published the results of an investigation into how jet propellant-5 — a kerosene-based fuel used in military aircraft and simply known as JP-5 — contaminated the potable water aboard USS Nimitz. The contamination led to nearly a dozen of the Nimitz's sailors reporting concerning symptoms that Navy officials would later acknowledge could have been the result of JP-5 exposure.

Sailors on the Nimitz first noticed that the ship's potable water smelled and tasted like jet fuel on September 16 of last year, but the problem started at least a year before that.

In a Monday statement summarizing the investigation's findings, the Navy found that "JP-5 residue in the ship's bilges entered an unused potable water tank through a deteriorated gasket on top of the tank sometime between June 2020 and March 2021, during the ship's previous deployment."

The ship's bilge is the lowest part of the inside of the hull where potentially hazardous substances — like fuel, oil, or sewage — collect during operations. According to the Navy's investigation, jet fuel likely ended up in the bilge space due to the misalignment or malfunction of the ship's main drainage system, which connects to tanks that hold JP-5. A failed manway cover gasket then allowed the leak into the offline potable water tank.

The investigation found that eight of the ship's 26 potable water tanks had been taken out of service since at least September 2020, with some of them listed as being out of service due to potential unspecified bilge contamination and seawater contamination, though the problems were only recorded informally and not adequately communicated to future crews.

"Failure to formally document the deficiency and promptly correct the issue allowed the condition to worsen, and it left the problem to future crew members who had no insight into circumstances of the original problem," the investigation says.

In March 2022, the Nimitz moved to clean several of its potable water tanks that were full of liquid and out of service due to suspected seawater contamination.

The Nimitz requested help from the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility, which emptied one tank but was unable to do more given the limited amount of time and resources available.

So the Nimitz developed a plan that included instructions on how to empty tanks using the ship's installed potable water pumps so it wouldn't have to wait for help from the shipyard.

"When developing the sequencing document used to empty potable water tanks, the ship was unaware that any of the tanks contained JP-5," the investigation says. "Informal records indicated tank contained a mixture of potable water and seawater. This was a major factor in the ship's understanding and consideration of the risk associated with pumping liquid from tank through the potable water piping."

Thinking the only problem was seawater, the ship determined that the risks of contaminating the broader potable water system by flushing the tanks out was low. "The ship did not know or consider the possibility that the tank might contain contaminants other than seawater," the investigation notes.

When sequencing commenced on September 16, 2022, the day reports of water that smelled of jet fuel surfaced, proper procedure wasn't followed, leaving key players in the process unfamiliar "with the procedure or system lineup" and "largely unaware that the procedure was being executed," the report explained.

So when "unexpected conditions," water that smelled like jet fuel, showed up, they "did not recognize the significance" and "were unable to determine or take appropriate corrective actions to prevent more significant consequences from occurring." The JP-5 then spread to the distribution system, creating a more serious issue.

While the investigation includes over a dozen recommendations for how to prevent this contamination from happening again, it does not mention any disciplinary action.

Not long after the problem was first discovered on the Nimitz, the Navy acknowledged it found only traces of jet fuel in the water. However, a sailor told Insider that the problem was worse than the service initially let on and that they were exposed to an "unhealthy amount" of JP-5.

And the Nimitz was not the only aircraft carrier to deal with contaminated water last year. The Navy also found that the drinking water aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln was polluted with bilge water and bacteria. One sailor told Insider the water tasted "horrible" and that they couldn't "escape it."

In addition to the Navy's findings on the contamination aboard the Nimitz, the service also investigated the presence of bacteria in the Abraham Lincoln's potable water and found that "bilge water entered a potable water tank through a hole, caused by corrosion, in the tank's ventilation pipe."

Polluted water on Navy ships is not isolated to these two vessels. Marine Corps and Navy veterans told Insider that sailors aboard aircraft carriers, and amphibious assault ships have, for decades, experienced water that's been contaminated by jet fuel.
Investigations into 2022 potable water contamination aboard Nimitz and Abraham Lincoln complete
by Commander, Naval Air Forces Public Affairs
15 May 2023

SAN DIEGO -- The U.S. Navy concluded its investigations into the separate potable water contamination incidents aboard Nimitz-class aircraft carriers USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) on Oct. 26 and Nov. 10, 2022 respectively.

The investigation into the presence of jet propellant-5 (JP-5) aboard Nimitz found that JP-5 residue in the ship’s bilges entered an unused potable water tank through a deteriorated gasket on top of the tank sometime between June 2020 and March 2021, during the ship’s previous deployment.

On Sept. 16, while the ship was operating off the coast of Southern California, Sailors aboard the ship reported a fuel-like smell and taste in the ship’s potable water. Engineering personnel immediately secured access to the ship's potable water and commenced testing of their potable water tanks. Free bottled water was made available to the crew during this time. While in port at Naval Air Station North Island Sept. 17-Oct. 2, Nimitz was connected to City of San Diego water supply. On Oct. 1, test results indicated that 22 of 26 potable water tanks tested below the health action level for JP-5 in drinking water recommended by the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center – 266 part per billion (ppb) – and the ship’s potable water was determined to be safe.

Nimitz returned to Bremerton, Wash. on Oct. 28 and the isolated tanks were thoroughly cleaned, repaired, inspected, and returned to service. Currently, all 26 potable water tanks on board are providing safe water to the crew.

Eleven Nimitz Sailors reported symptoms that may have been a result of JP-5 ingestion. Those Sailors were treated by the medical staff aboard the ship, their symptoms resolved, and all 11 Sailors were cleared to return to duty by Oct. 5, 2022.

The investigation into the presence of bacteria in the potable water on Abraham Lincoln found that bilge water entered a potable water tank through a hole, caused by corrosion, in the tank’s ventilation pipe while Abraham Lincoln was in port at Naval Air Station North Island, Sept. 17-21, 2022.

After getting underway at approximately 1 p.m. PDT on Sept. 21, the ship’s engineering personnel identified an abnormal taste in the water being supplied from the contaminated tank. In accordance with Navy procedures, the tank was immediately taken off line and the water in the tank was tested for free available chlorine (FAC); the results indicate that the FAC levels were within specifications and the contaminated tank was placed back in service. At approximately 7 p.m., engineering personnel reported abnormal smell and color, in addition to taste, in the ship’s water and the Engineering Officer of the Watch ordered that all potable water tanks currently online be isolated. On Sept. 22, results from tests conducted aboard the ship indicated that E. coli and coliform bacteria were present in three of the ship’s 26 potable water tanks. Those tanks were secured from the potable water system and free bottled water was made available to the crew.

The corroded ventilation pipe was repaired and the affected potable water tanks were deep-cleaned and inspected as part of the ship’s ongoing in-port maintenance period. All 26 of Abraham Lincoln’s potable water tanks have been tested and are providing safe water to the crew.

There were no confirmed cases of illness related to the ship’s water.

Commander, Naval Air Forces, Naval Sea Systems Command, the Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, and the Navy & Marine Corps Public Health Center continue a dedicated effort to review and update policies and procedures on potable water maintenance and corrective actions to ensure the health and safety of our Sailors.

The full investigation can be found here: https://www.cpf.navy.mil/FOIA-Reading-Room/