The problem they have is that the parts they want are only available as commercial standard. If they want it hardened, they need a completely new design to be made around that for which they'll be the only customer. For simple electronics where both designs are produced in volume 10% is pretty reasonable. For this application 100x is more likely if you can persuade someone to make the parts for you at all.Belushi TD wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:49 pmIs this 10% surcharge similar for commercial/government space flight components? If not, why not? What's different about it?
...Boeing Preparing For SLS Cancellation.....
Re: ...Boeing Preparing For SLS Cancellation.....
War is less costly than servitude. The choice is always between Verdun and Dachau. - Jean Dutourd
-
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:50 am
Re: ...Boeing Preparing For SLS Cancellation.....
a lot more that 10%Belushi TD wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:49 pm I seem to recall Stuart telling us at some point that "hardening" electronics induces about 10% on top of the cost, at least for milspec and aimed at EMP sort of things.
Is this 10% surcharge similar for commercial/government space flight components? If not, why not? What's different about it?
Belushi TD
Re: ...Boeing Preparing For SLS Cancellation.....
The RAD hardened custom CPU's are 1/100 the speed of regular CPU's and they don't use regular programming language.Belushi TD wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 5:49 pm I seem to recall Stuart telling us at some point that "hardening" electronics induces about 10% on top of the cost, at least for milspec and aimed at EMP sort of things.
Is this 10% surcharge similar for commercial/government space flight components? If not, why not? What's different about it?
Belushi TD
Discussion of SpaceX's rad hardened design.
https://aviationweek.com/dragons-radiat ... ant-design