OOC Thread

Long and short stories from the 1984 movie
Lordroel
Posts: 758
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Wolfman wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:54 pm Lukedalton is at it again over on Lordroel’s forum…
I see, but as long as it is a discussion there is not much i will do.
Wolfman
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

My last was intended for the rest of the Brain Trust.
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Lordroel
Posts: 758
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Wolfman wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 3:28 pm My last was intended for the rest of the Brain Trust.
My apologies.
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 863
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Bernard Woolley »

Wolfman wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:54 pm Lukedalton is at it again over on Lordroel’s forum…
If he wants to expound his ideas for the RDverse, then as far as I’m concerned he can do so until the cows come home. It has no impact on established canon.
Wolfman
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Fair enough. That said, his mention of the Mirage 4000 possibly getting a production run has me thinking that in that, at least, he might possibly have a point…
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Matt Wiser
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Matt Wiser »

Mirage 4000 getting some orders-especially since the normal American and British suppliers are busy with wartime orders, is a possibility.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 863
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Bernard Woolley »

A Saudi order?
Matt Wiser
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Matt Wiser »

Very possible: they were looking at it in the early '80s, before their hoped-for second round of F-15s was killed by the Israeli lobby, and they went to Tornado IDS and F. With the war on, that order gets deferred as the RAF appropriates the birds on the production line.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 863
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Bernard Woolley »

Although, what does the Mirage 4000 give in terms of capabilities that the 2000 doesn’t? Would it have been significantly better for the Saudis to risk being the only operator, or being stuck with development costs?
Wolfman
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Well, I was thinking of the Mirage 4000 being a heavy strike fighter akin to the F-15E, and it entering service to replace the nuclear version of the Mirage 2000 in 1987…
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
James1978
Posts: 1377
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 8:38 pm

Re: OOC Thread

Post by James1978 »

RE: Mirage 4000

Some @ info to consider re. the Mirage 4000:
* Private venture development financed by Dassault.
* Single aircraft built.
* The aircraft was a one-third scaled up Mirage 2000 with two M53 engines.
* Systems and avionics from the Mirage 2000 were borrowed whenever possible.
* Aerodynamics virtually identical to Mirage 2000.
* First flown on 9 March 1979. Grounded 1983.
* Returned to flight in 1986 to undertake trials for the Rafale program. Last flight 8 January 1988.
* Still in use by the French Flight Test Center (CEV) in 1989.

The war kicks off in early September 1985, yes?

In @, the Saudi Tornado contract wasn't signed until 25 September 1985. First IDS delivery was 26 March 1986, and first ADV delivery was 20 March 1989. That's for an in-service and in-production aircraft.

So I'd say it's a question of what the French GOVERNMENT wants.
Consider the following for the Mirage 2000N:
* Prototype ordered in 1979.
* Mirage 2000N prototype first flight was 3 February 1983.
* First batch budgeted in 1983 defense budget.
* First flight of production Mirage 2000N was 3 February 1986.

As an added wrinkle, the Rafale A first flight was 4 July 1986.

So in late September 1985, does the French government tell Dassault to stop work on the Mirage 2000N and probably Rafale, and commit resources to turning a single prototype program into the future of the French Air Force?

Could a large foreign order make the Mirage 4000 possible? Maybe. But by the time it's production ready, you can probably have Rafale. I think it's more likely that the Saudi's fund what became Mirage 2000D and that program moves up a couple years.

Or, do the French Government and Dassault step back and look at all the potential F-16 customers who want new fighters, and throw resources into ramping up the Mirage 2000 line and accelerate Mirage 2000N and Rafale development?
Poohbah
Posts: 2848
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Poohbah »

James1978 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 1:38 am RE: Mirage 4000

Some @ info to consider re. the Mirage 4000:
* Private venture development financed by Dassault.
* Single aircraft built.
* The aircraft was a one-third scaled up Mirage 2000 with two M53 engines.
* Systems and avionics from the Mirage 2000 were borrowed whenever possible.
* Aerodynamics virtually identical to Mirage 2000.
* First flown on 9 March 1979. Grounded 1983.
* Returned to flight in 1986 to undertake trials for the Rafale program. Last flight 8 January 1988.
* Still in use by the French Flight Test Center (CEV) in 1989.

The war kicks off in early September 1985, yes?

In @, the Saudi Tornado contract wasn't signed until 25 September 1985. First IDS delivery was 26 March 1986, and first ADV delivery was 20 March 1989. That's for an in-service and in-production aircraft.

So I'd say it's a question of what the French GOVERNMENT wants.
Consider the following for the Mirage 2000N:
* Prototype ordered in 1979.
* Mirage 2000N prototype first flight was 3 February 1983.
* First batch budgeted in 1983 defense budget.
* First flight of production Mirage 2000N was 3 February 1986.

As an added wrinkle, the Rafale A first flight was 4 July 1986.

So in late September 1985, does the French government tell Dassault to stop work on the Mirage 2000N and probably Rafale, and commit resources to turning a single prototype program into the future of the French Air Force?

Could a large foreign order make the Mirage 4000 possible? Maybe. But by the time it's production ready, you can probably have Rafale. I think it's more likely that the Saudi's fund what became Mirage 2000D and that program moves up a couple years.

Or, do the French Government and Dassault step back and look at all the potential F-16 customers who want new fighters, and throw resources into ramping up the Mirage 2000 line and accelerate Mirage 2000N and Rafale development?
With all of the pre-1985 ripples that happen, the Mirage 4000 program doesn't die off. The whole process NATO imploding will give serious impetus to improving the Force de Dissuasion and French long-range strike capabilities in general, and the program continues without interruption. As a result, the Mirage 4000 is in low-rate production when the balloon goes up, and everyone who needs a long range interceptor/strike aircraft (and that's a LOT of countries around the world, actually, now that things are going KABOOM on the regular) start waving checkbooks, and "low-rate production" quickly goes to "three shifts."
Wolfman
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Wolfman »

Poohbah wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 1:53 am
James1978 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 1:38 am RE: Mirage 4000

Some @ info to consider re. the Mirage 4000:
* Private venture development financed by Dassault.
* Single aircraft built.
* The aircraft was a one-third scaled up Mirage 2000 with two M53 engines.
* Systems and avionics from the Mirage 2000 were borrowed whenever possible.
* Aerodynamics virtually identical to Mirage 2000.
* First flown on 9 March 1979. Grounded 1983.
* Returned to flight in 1986 to undertake trials for the Rafale program. Last flight 8 January 1988.
* Still in use by the French Flight Test Center (CEV) in 1989.

The war kicks off in early September 1985, yes?

In @, the Saudi Tornado contract wasn't signed until 25 September 1985. First IDS delivery was 26 March 1986, and first ADV delivery was 20 March 1989. That's for an in-service and in-production aircraft.

So I'd say it's a question of what the French GOVERNMENT wants.
Consider the following for the Mirage 2000N:
* Prototype ordered in 1979.
* Mirage 2000N prototype first flight was 3 February 1983.
* First batch budgeted in 1983 defense budget.
* First flight of production Mirage 2000N was 3 February 1986.

As an added wrinkle, the Rafale A first flight was 4 July 1986.

So in late September 1985, does the French government tell Dassault to stop work on the Mirage 2000N and probably Rafale, and commit resources to turning a single prototype program into the future of the French Air Force?

Could a large foreign order make the Mirage 4000 possible? Maybe. But by the time it's production ready, you can probably have Rafale. I think it's more likely that the Saudi's fund what became Mirage 2000D and that program moves up a couple years.

Or, do the French Government and Dassault step back and look at all the potential F-16 customers who want new fighters, and throw resources into ramping up the Mirage 2000 line and accelerate Mirage 2000N and Rafale development?
With all of the pre-1985 ripples that happen, the Mirage 4000 program doesn't die off. The whole process NATO imploding will give serious impetus to improving the Force de Dissuasion and French long-range strike capabilities in general, and the program continues without interruption. As a result, the Mirage 4000 is in low-rate production when the balloon goes up, and everyone who needs a long range interceptor/strike aircraft (and that's a LOT of countries around the world, actually, now that things are going KABOOM on the regular) start waving checkbooks, and "low-rate production" quickly goes to "three shifts."
Hit the nail on the head, Poohbah!
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 863
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Bernard Woolley »

Does the French watermelon government want to improve its long range strike capability? After all, some of its members are in the pockets of the KGB.
Lordroel
Posts: 758
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Lordroel »

Bernard Woolley wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2025 12:28 pm Does the French watermelon government want to improve its long range strike capability? After all, some of its members are in the pockets of the KGB.
If we go by the original script for 1984 movie then called Ten Soldiers we see some interesting prologue with parts not shown in movie prologue, including something the French would do if it would do if it benefits them.

- France Signs Non-Aggression Pact with Soviets.
Matt Wiser
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: OOC Thread

Post by Matt Wiser »

Mitterand is still French President TTL, but he has to tread cautiously in 1985-6 as a number of members of the French Parliament are on the KGB payroll. However, upgrading the French nuclear deterrent is something he has enough of a majority to do so, even if it's a slim one. Especially as Dassault points out that there will be French jobs created as a result of the Mirage 4000 program.

Also, remember that the French military and the DGSE maintained quiet links to the Allies during the war, sharing intelligence among other things being done. The Soviet carrier group photographed by a French Navy MPA shown in the photo section? Once the aircraft was clear, the position was reported-over GUARD, in the clear, and in English. And this wasn't the only time.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
Post Reply