The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Long and short stories from the 1984 movie
Post Reply
Craiglxviii
Posts: 2110
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 7:25 am

The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Craiglxviii »

Copied from the Internet Archive.

Author Message
Bernard Woolley
Post subject: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:09 am
Online

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:00 pm
Posts: 7537
Location: At the computer.
By March 1987 it was clear that their campaign against the United Kingdom was not going too well. Despite round the clock bombing raids they had failed to destroy the RAF, or to put a serious dent in British industrial production and to cap it all the RAF Lancer bomber fleet was regularly hitting Soviet targets. The naval blockade was also not going too well - the combined ASW forces of the Royal Navy, US Navy and RCN were keeping the sea lanes to the UK open.

The fighting in North America was taking up the majority of the Soviet's resources and it looked like a previously neutral Western Europe might enter the war on the side of the Allies, so they decided that they had to do something to force Britain to the negotiating table and fast, before it became too late.

Who exactly came up with the Soviet plan is unknown, evidently they were not allowed to plan anything ever again. Put simply the plan was that the Soviet Baltic Fleet would be sent out into the North Sea, clear a way through the Royal Navy and cover an amphibious landing by the Baltic Fleet Naval Infantry Regiment. Two Motor Rifle Regiments would follow this invasion. The thinking behind the plan was that as soon as Soviet regular troops were ashore in Britain that there would be a spontaneous uprising by the 'oppressed British people' and that they would be able to march on London at the head of a British mob (as the French had believed in the 18th Century).

Good intelligence meant that the Royal Navy knew well in advance that the Soviets were coming and assembled a fleet that included six aircraft carriers (Bulwark, the three Invincible class, Furious and Glorious) and as many escorts as they could spare from the GIUK Gap and convoy escort duty. The RN also concentrated as many SSN and SSK that could be deployed in time.

Although officially neutral the West German and Danish navies helped out by tracking the Soviet Baltic Fleet as it advanced and routinely broadcast their position. Unsurprisingly the Soviets took a dim view of this and the resulting skirmishes were one of the catalysts for Western European entry into the War. The Danes and Norwegians also activated their defensive minefields, which forced the Soviets to sail in more restrictive waters than they would have liked. As the Soviets sailed through the Baltic Narrows the Scandinavian navies came out to play 'tag' when they allegedly infringed Norwegian and Danish territorial waters. During this confusion the Soviet carrier Yuri Andropov was torpedoed and sunk by a submarine now believed to be a Norwegian SSK.

The involvement of the Danish and Norwegian navies reflected that both nations had chosen neutrality as a matter of national survival rather than conviction. They both knew better than many other European nations just what the effects of not standing up to an aggressor. However without the support of their former NATO allies and with the unwillingness of the WEU to get involved in the war they would not be able to stand-up to the Soviets on their own. However both nations did send volunteer contingents to North America and once again Norwegian troops trained in Scotland and Canada.

Once in the Baltic Narrows the battle began in earnest as the Soviets effectively entered a shooting gallery. They were hit by multiple air attacks from RAF Buccaneers, RN Sea Harriers, RAF Harrier GR.3s and multiple submarine attacks, their Yak-38 'Forgers' proved to be ineffective in defence and were slaughtered by the Sea Harriers armed as escorts, and RAF Phantoms and Tornado F.3s. However the British did not have it all their own way as the RN battle group came under attack by a regiment of Tu-22M 'Backfires' and several regiments of Su-24 'Fencers' flying from East Germany.

During this exchange the Soviets lost two Kiev class carriers, a Kirov class cruiser and about twenty other ships, plus many more damaged to various degrees of severity. The Royal Navy lost two carriers (Invincible and Glorious) and two damaged (Bulwark and Furious), and ten escorts sunk, or crippled.

The surviving Soviet warships were forced to retreat, harried all the way into the Baltic by RN submarines. During the pursuit the Type 12 frigate HMS Yarmouth (the Crazy Y) distinguished herself by boarding and capturing a crippled Soviet Krivak class frigate, towing it into Rosyth two days later as part of the group escorting the badly damaged HMS Bulwark.

The Soviet amphibious group and other troop transports had only just begun to enter the Baltic Narrows when news arrived of the catastrophe in the Exits. Wisely they chose to reverse course before the came into range of the RN and RAF, to the regret of many on the British side.

Over the next two days crippled ships from both sides trickled into whatever ports they could. However the battle was effectively over and both sides began to count the costs. What was immediately clear was that the British had won a famous victory and this was broadcast to the world.

Although defeated in this attempt to force the United Kingdom out of the war the Soviets would make one final attempt to defeat Britain. This time they would use an airborne invasion, but that, dear reader, is another story.

For more information see: Battle for the Exits - the Royal Navy versus the Soviet Baltic Fleet, 21st March 1987 by Eric Grove.

***

HMS Yarmouth.

Image

_________________
Saga Noren wrote:
Everybody is alive eight hours before they die.


Last edited by Bernard Woolley on Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top Profile

Matt Wiser
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:59 am
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:31 am
Posts: 2592
Location: Auberry, CA
So what happened to the Krivak? Was she incorporated into the RN like they would've done with a French or Spanish ship back in the day? Used for target practice postwar, or maybe, just maybe, preserved as a museum?

_________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect. But always have a plan to kill them.

Old USMC Adage

Top Profile

Bernard Woolley
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:30 am
Online

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:00 pm
Posts: 7537
Location: At the computer.
Either preserved as a museum after being studied, or recycled into new steel for the RN construction programme. Might be appropriate if she ended up being incorporated into a new frigate, or corvette.

_________________
Saga Noren wrote:
Everybody is alive eight hours before they die.


Top Profile

Poohbah
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:28 am
Offline

Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 2167
Which Kirov went down? Frunze was sunk with the Eastern Pacific Squadron on D-Day (torpedoed by the USS Bremerton).


Top Profile

jemhouston
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:47 am
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:32 pm
Posts: 1448
Despite no naval background, I love a good warfair at sea strike. Now if the Warspite was still around and firing, it would have been perfect. :lol: :lol:

_________________
"Brilliance is typically the act of an individual,
but incredible stupidity can usually be traced to an organization."
Jon Bentley

"Never attribute to malice what can be adequately
explained by stupidity."
Nick Diamos

Top Profile

The Bushranger
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:10 am
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:37 pm
Posts: 3119
Location: BM-9, BB-30
jemhouston wrote:
Despite no naval background, I love a good warfair at sea strike. Now if the Warspite was still around and firing, it would have been perfect. :lol: :lol:

In order to see battleship surface actions, you would have needed to come to the Gulf of Mexico. We got a Sovremenny and a Krivak - needless to say, we were proud as punch. Or would have been except for the fish we took in the screws in that same engagement....

(OOC: Finally found the post in the original thread about this. Was hard to find. :shock: )

_________________
JNiemczyk1 wrote:
I suspect what actually happened was that the Germans struggled ashore, ran out of everything and were arrested by Kent Constabulary for parking a Panzer on a double yellow line.

David Newton wrote:
It's not legal, it's Obama.


Top Profile

trekchu
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:23 am
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 2954
Location: On the shores of Lake Armstrong
"What do you mean our fleet has been defeated by the puny British?"

*BANG!*


- Soviet Baltic Fleet HQ, circa 1987.

_________________
The Cerberus Gambit - Last update 11/02/12

"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." - Carl Schurz

Top Profile

Matt Wiser
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:42 am
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:31 am
Posts: 2592
Location: Auberry, CA
The CINC-Soviet Pacific Fleet would've had a similar end, if not for the fact he went down with his flagship after the failed Seattle Amphib assault in June '86. They shot his deputy instead.....

_________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect. But always have a plan to kill them.

Old USMC Adage

Top Profile

M Jolly
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 10:17 am
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:41 pm
Posts: 620
Sorry just had a Star wars Empire strikes back moment,

trekchu wrote:
"What do you mean our fleet has been defeated by the puny British?"

*BANG!*


- Soviet Baltic Fleet HQ, circa 1987.


"Commander Peit, hunt down the British fleet. Do not fail me Admiral ...."

Sorry could not resist


Top Profile

trekchu
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 11:10 am
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 2954
Location: On the shores of Lake Armstrong
M Jolly wrote:
Sorry just had a Star wars Empire strikes back moment,

trekchu wrote:
"What do you mean our fleet has been defeated by the puny British?"

*BANG!*


- Soviet Baltic Fleet HQ, circa 1987.


"Commander Peit, hunt down the British fleet. Do not fail me Admiral ...."

Sorry could not resist


OOC: Now I want to write an AAOverse Sci-Fi/Star Wars Crossover!

_________________
The Cerberus Gambit - Last update 11/02/12

"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." - Carl Schurz

Top Profile

jemhouston
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 11:12 am
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:32 pm
Posts: 1448
The Bushranger wrote:
jemhouston wrote:
Despite no naval background, I love a good warfair at sea strike. Now if the Warspite was still around and firing, it would have been perfect. :lol: :lol:

In order to see battleship surface actions, you would have needed to come to the Gulf of Mexico. We got a Sovremenny and a Krivak - needless to say, we were proud as punch. Or would have been except for the fish we took in the screws in that same engagement....

(OOC: Finally found the post in the original thread about this. Was hard to find. :shock: )



I think I saw (and felt) several battleship broadsides against Soviet Army one time. I was woke up by it. When I asked if it was a nuke, I was told, "Either a battleship got angry at them or it's Arc Light".


Can't remember the date, so I can't find out.

_________________
"Brilliance is typically the act of an individual,
but incredible stupidity can usually be traced to an organization."
Jon Bentley

"Never attribute to malice what can be adequately
explained by stupidity."
Nick Diamos

Top Profile

trekchu
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 11:23 am
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 2954
Location: On the shores of Lake Armstrong
If there is anything I am grateful to the Navy for it's their gunfire support.

_________________
The Cerberus Gambit - Last update 11/02/12

"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." - Carl Schurz

Top Profile

Wolfman
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:53 pm
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 7:09 pm
Posts: 1197
What about Marine CAS?

_________________
"For a brick, he flew pretty good!" Sgt. Maj. A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

Top Profile

trekchu
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:13 pm
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 2954
Location: On the shores of Lake Armstrong
That too of course though most of the time we were too f**cking busy to read the markings. :)

_________________
The Cerberus Gambit - Last update 11/02/12

"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." - Carl Schurz

Top Profile

Wolfman
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:58 pm
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 7:09 pm
Posts: 1197
Point taken.

_________________
"For a brick, he flew pretty good!" Sgt. Maj. A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

Top Profile

trekchu
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:03 pm
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 2954
Location: On the shores of Lake Armstrong
Yeah.

Though I do have this picture in my head of a Soviet skipper having his ship sink around him, a Buccaneer racing overhead, with the British roundels displayed proudly and from somewhere Hearts of Oak can be heard. :mrgreen:

_________________
The Cerberus Gambit - Last update 11/02/12

"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." - Carl Schurz

Top Profile

Wolfman
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:19 pm
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 7:09 pm
Posts: 1197
I've got a similar one, except it's an A-6E Intruder and the Marine Corps Hymn is going full blast in the background.

_________________
"For a brick, he flew pretty good!" Sgt. Maj. A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

Top Profile

Matt Wiser
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:26 pm
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:31 am
Posts: 2592
Location: Auberry, CA
For retirees who were in 419 back in '86, it's Die Walkure and their F-105s at the Seattle Amphib.

_________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect. But always have a plan to kill them.

Old USMC Adage

Top Profile

M Jolly
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:29 pm
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:41 pm
Posts: 620
Ah the battle of the baltic exits, the RAF flew top cover for parts of this operation (I was unlucky enough to land in the drink during that), watching the footage from the different sources and the accounts the Navy Reminded the Soviets why Britannia rules the waves and is the third most powerful navy in the world :)

OOC: do the star wars /AAO verse mashup, you know you want to :)


Top Profile

Wolfman
Post subject: Re: Battle of the Baltic Exits - 21st March 1987.PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:11 pm
Offline

Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 7:09 pm
Posts: 1197
The Soviets got stupid, and paid for it, in spades.

_________________
"For a brick, he flew pretty good!" Sgt. Maj. A.J. Johnson, Halo 2
Wolfman
Posts: 818
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Wolfman »

My sentiment from back then still stands. The Soviets suffered from a terminal case of Stupidity and paid the price for it.
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
TheMann
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:52 am

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by TheMann »

Wolfman wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 10:15 pm My sentiment from back then still stands. The Soviets suffered from a terminal case of Stupidity and paid the price for it.
I'd say that's almost being too kind. They never had a chance at that one, and I'm always amazed their RORSATs didn't tell them that the British were waiting for them to try that stunt, I know they were watching the Europeans like a hawk at that point. If the RORSATs did pick it up and they still tried it, well, being shot for it would have been too good for those cretins. Way to lose a vast collection of valuable ships for absolutely fuck all.
User avatar
jemhouston
Posts: 3837
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:38 am

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by jemhouston »

Which was planned the worse, The Battle of Puget Sound or The Battle of the Baltic Exits?
Poohbah
Posts: 2435
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Poohbah »

jemhouston wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:25 am Which was planned the worse, The Battle of Puget Sound or The Battle of the Baltic Exits?
The WW2 IJN staff looks at those two battles and says, "Man, the Soviet Navy's planners rode the short battleship to Tsushima."
User avatar
jemhouston
Posts: 3837
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:38 am

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by jemhouston »

Poohbah wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 1:15 pm
jemhouston wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:25 am Which was planned the worse, The Battle of Puget Sound or The Battle of the Baltic Exits?
The WW2 IJN staff looks at those two battles and says, "Man, the Soviet Navy's planners rode the short battleship to Tsushima."
Battle of the Baltic Exits both sides had a plan, and the UK one worked better. Battle of Puget Sound the US had a plan which worked better than expected, the Soviets had a vague idea.
TheMann
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:52 am

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by TheMann »

jemhouston wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:59 pm
Poohbah wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 1:15 pm
jemhouston wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 11:25 am Which was planned the worse, The Battle of Puget Sound or The Battle of the Baltic Exits?
The WW2 IJN staff looks at those two battles and says, "Man, the Soviet Navy's planners rode the short battleship to Tsushima."
Battle of the Baltic Exits both sides had a plan, and the UK one worked better. Battle of Puget Sound the US had a plan which worked better than expected, the Soviets had a vague idea.
The Soviet "plan" for Puget Sound had to have been developed while all the flags were shit-faced drunk and they all went "Fuck it, let's just send everyone there and see what happens." If they'd had any sense they would have used that fleet to relieve Vancouver, but they didn't so....
Wolfman
Posts: 818
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Wolfman »

The way the chain of command was set up certainly didn’t help Ivan, either…
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Poohbah
Posts: 2435
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Poohbah »

Wolfman wrote: Thu Feb 01, 2024 1:29 am The way the chain of command was set up certainly didn’t help Ivan, either…
As I explained it in a lunch and learn session recently, combat is a highly fluid situation. The only way to impose any order on it is to plan for your contingencies, maintain your initiative, and never share command. That last, especially. Sharing command is never a good idea.
TheMann
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:52 am

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by TheMann »

Poohbah wrote: Thu Feb 01, 2024 1:49 am
Wolfman wrote: Thu Feb 01, 2024 1:29 am The way the chain of command was set up certainly didn’t help Ivan, either…
As I explained it in a lunch and learn session recently, combat is a highly fluid situation. The only way to impose any order on it is to plan for your contingencies, maintain your initiative, and never share command. That last, especially. Sharing command is never a good idea.
I've said that many times in slightly different words to my officers and senior nom-coms as well.
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 693
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Bernard Woolley »

It’s great to see that this was saved.
User avatar
jemhouston
Posts: 3837
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:38 am

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by jemhouston »

TheMann wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:25 am
Wolfman wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 10:15 pm My sentiment from back then still stands. The Soviets suffered from a terminal case of Stupidity and paid the price for it.
I'd say that's almost being too kind. They never had a chance at that one, and I'm always amazed their RORSATs didn't tell them that the British were waiting for them to try that stunt, I know they were watching the Europeans like a hawk at that point. If the RORSATs did pick it up and they still tried it, well, being shot for it would have been too good for those cretins. Way to lose a vast collection of valuable ships for absolutely fuck all.
The USAF liked using the RORSATS to verify any changes they made to the ASAT. The USN sent the ASAT team a case of Bourbon when they killed one.
Wolfman
Posts: 818
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 4:03 pm
Location: LCS-3, BB-35, CGN-39, SSN-775

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Wolfman »

jemhouston wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 2:58 am
TheMann wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:25 am
Wolfman wrote: Tue May 16, 2023 10:15 pm My sentiment from back then still stands. The Soviets suffered from a terminal case of Stupidity and paid the price for it.
I'd say that's almost being too kind. They never had a chance at that one, and I'm always amazed their RORSATs didn't tell them that the British were waiting for them to try that stunt, I know they were watching the Europeans like a hawk at that point. If the RORSATs did pick it up and they still tried it, well, being shot for it would have been too good for those cretins. Way to lose a vast collection of valuable ships for absolutely fuck all.
The USAF liked using the RORSATS to verify any changes they made to the ASAT. The USN sent the ASAT team a case of Bourbon when they killed one.
Supposedly, one of the ones that had been in storage almost cost the Air Force an F-15 when it blew.
“For a brick, he flew pretty good!” Sgt. Major A.J. Johnson, Halo 2

To err is human; to forgive is not SAC policy.

“This is Raven 2-5. This is my sandbox. You will not drop, acknowledge.” David Flanagan, former Raven FAC
Poohbah
Posts: 2435
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:08 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Poohbah »

Wolfman wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 3:21 am
jemhouston wrote: Sat Feb 03, 2024 2:58 am
TheMann wrote: Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:25 am

I'd say that's almost being too kind. They never had a chance at that one, and I'm always amazed their RORSATs didn't tell them that the British were waiting for them to try that stunt, I know they were watching the Europeans like a hawk at that point. If the RORSATs did pick it up and they still tried it, well, being shot for it would have been too good for those cretins. Way to lose a vast collection of valuable ships for absolutely fuck all.
The USAF liked using the RORSATS to verify any changes they made to the ASAT. The USN sent the ASAT team a case of Bourbon when they killed one.
Supposedly, one of the ones that had been in storage almost cost the Air Force an F-15 when it blew.
I met General Nakamura a few years ago, and she said that was the scariest moment she ever had in the pilot's seat.
Matt Wiser
Posts: 786
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 2:48 am
Location: Auberry, CA

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by Matt Wiser »

She said the same thing to me at an F-15 Eagle Association get-together a few years back: "Long way to skydive" was going through her head-every time she flew an ASAT mission, but especially on that one.
The difference between diplomacy and war is this: Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so elegantly that they pack for the trip.
War is bringing hell down on that someone.
User avatar
jemhouston
Posts: 3837
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 12:38 am

Re: The Battle of the Baltic Exits 1987)

Post by jemhouston »

James Orberg, "Red Star In Orbit", about the war in space from the Soviet viewpoint had a chapter on their trying to develop a fighter launch ASAT. They lost two fighters; one missile did explode shortly after release. The second, instead of releasing the missile, when the launch command was given, the booster ignited while still on the fighter. It went out of control. Both pilots were killed.

The project was destroyed during an Eastern Express mission.
Post Reply