Oppenheimer

Good books? Great Films? Good television? Best Music? Or those that really need avoidance? This is where to review and comment on new fact or fiction.
Post Reply
Simon Darkshade
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:55 am

Oppenheimer

Post by Simon Darkshade »

Oppenheimer is an outstanding picture. It has my highest possible recommendation. The theatre was utterly silent in the moments after the Trinity test, spellbound. The ending few scenes didn’t pack as much of a punch as Dunkirk’s, but were masterly in their own right; the discussion between Oppenheimer and Einstein was deep and existed on multiple levels, a bit of a take on the quantum theme.

The only thing that could make it better would have been a cameo by Bryan Cranston as Walter Heisenberg. ;) All jokes aside, the casting was seriously well done and deep, with even cameos played to the hilt.

Nolan has always put out *well made* pictures and this is absolutely one of his very best. I’m going to watch it again to fully take it in, the first time I’ve seen a picture more than once at the cinema in 18 years.
Belushi TD
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 11:20 am

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Belushi TD »

My children and wife have informed me that I am going to the movies next weekend.

However, they did NOT tell me WHICH movie I have to see. They are all going to see Barbie. I am going to see Oppenheimer.

Your review makes me happy. From the previews it did NOT seem like the kind of fluff movie it could have been, but I am glad to have confirmation from a reasonably respected source.

Belushi TD
Johnnie Lyle
Posts: 2876
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:27 pm

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Johnnie Lyle »

Belushi TD wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 4:28 pm My children and wife have informed me that I am going to the movies next weekend.

However, they did NOT tell me WHICH movie I have to see. They are all going to see Barbie. I am going to see Oppenheimer.

Your review makes me happy. From the previews it did NOT seem like the kind of fluff movie it could have been, but I am glad to have confirmation from a reasonably respected source.

Belushi TD
Not doing a Barbiehammer?

The review wars for Barbie are looking hilarious.

It’s good to know Oppenheimer will be worth adding to the streaming queue, where the seats and refreshments are both cheaper and better.
Belushi TD
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 11:20 am

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Belushi TD »

Johnnie Lyle wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 4:33 pm
Belushi TD wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 4:28 pm My children and wife have informed me that I am going to the movies next weekend.

However, they did NOT tell me WHICH movie I have to see. They are all going to see Barbie. I am going to see Oppenheimer.

Your review makes me happy. From the previews it did NOT seem like the kind of fluff movie it could have been, but I am glad to have confirmation from a reasonably respected source.

Belushi TD
Not doing a Barbiehammer?

The review wars for Barbie are looking hilarious.

It’s good to know Oppenheimer will be worth adding to the streaming queue, where the seats and refreshments are both cheaper and better.

F&CK Barbie, F&CK Ken, and F&CK the idiocy associated with that particular play toy.

I get it. Loads of people think its cute or kitzchy or whatever. I don't, and I want nothing to do with it.

And I also get that you were being "funny". Suffice it to say that this is one of the topics that I am as unwilling to bend as the Senior Chief is about, well... most anything political. *grin*

Belushi TD
Johnnie Lyle
Posts: 2876
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 2:27 pm

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Johnnie Lyle »

Belushi TD wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 4:36 pm
Johnnie Lyle wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 4:33 pm
Belushi TD wrote: Mon Jul 24, 2023 4:28 pm My children and wife have informed me that I am going to the movies next weekend.

However, they did NOT tell me WHICH movie I have to see. They are all going to see Barbie. I am going to see Oppenheimer.

Your review makes me happy. From the previews it did NOT seem like the kind of fluff movie it could have been, but I am glad to have confirmation from a reasonably respected source.

Belushi TD
Not doing a Barbiehammer?

The review wars for Barbie are looking hilarious.

It’s good to know Oppenheimer will be worth adding to the streaming queue, where the seats and refreshments are both cheaper and better.

F&CK Barbie, F&CK Ken, and F&CK the idiocy associated with that particular play toy.

I get it. Loads of people think its cute or kitzchy or whatever. I don't, and I want nothing to do with it.

And I also get that you were being "funny". Suffice it to say that this is one of the topics that I am as unwilling to bend as the Senior Chief is about, well... most anything political. *grin*

Belushi TD
Hey, Barbie’s beach boats make good ersatz amphibious assault craft. So it’s all not totally useless.

I do find the memewars over Barbie, especially the overt woke “girls good, boys bad” and Ken’s subversive “fight the matriarchy” to be legit darkly hilarious.

But, honestly, movie cinema is too damn expensive for pretty much anything to be worth it.
kdahm
Posts: 1024
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:08 pm

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by kdahm »

I'd go for a BarbieHeimer.

Now let's see, where's my piecutter? Anyone have the coordinates for Barbie's Beach House, or her Malibu Mansion? Think Trinity would be too big or too small?
Lordroel
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Lordroel »

Simon Darkshade wrote: Sun Jul 23, 2023 7:47 am Oppenheimer is an outstanding picture. It has my highest possible recommendation. The theatre was utterly silent in the moments after the Trinity test, spellbound. The ending few scenes didn’t pack as much of a punch as Dunkirk’s, but were masterly in their own right; the discussion between Oppenheimer and Einstein was deep and existed on multiple levels, a bit of a take on the quantum theme.

The only thing that could make it better would have been a cameo by Bryan Cranston as Walter Heisenberg. ;) All jokes aside, the casting was seriously well done and deep, with even cameos played to the hilt.

Nolan has always put out *well made* pictures and this is absolutely one of his very best. I’m going to watch it again to fully take it in, the first time I’ve seen a picture more than once at the cinema in 18 years.
Image
Simon Darkshade
Posts: 1127
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:55 am

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Simon Darkshade »

No, it doesn’t, nor does it need to. They seem to be a modern innovation of the childish comic book movies and this picture is the complete antithesis of those; the only time I’ve seen one done well was at the end of The Disaster Artist, which was a comedy.
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 791
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Bernard Woolley »

Saw it last Sunday. The three hours went past really quickly. There was just enough technical stuff about The Gadget without getting bogged down in “Gun Type” and “Implosion Device”. Though I’m sure we’d have all loved that. :D

While I’m not complaining, I’m not sure that Florence Pugh getting her kit off was really necessary, or drove the plot forward!
Micael
Posts: 3930
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:50 am

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Micael »

I saw it today, excellent movie. I had the pleasure of watching the 70 mm film version on a very big screen. They also gave me a neat souvenir.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Bernard Woolley
Posts: 791
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:06 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Bernard Woolley »

I saw it on an IMAX screen. Which I heartily recommend.
Micael
Posts: 3930
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:50 am

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Micael »

Bernard Woolley wrote: Sat Jul 29, 2023 9:48 pm I saw it on an IMAX screen. Which I heartily recommend.
IMAX is cool, but the nerd in me appreciates the old school 70 mm format shown (in this case) on two DP70 projectors from 1958, and managed by a technically retired 72 year old operator who held a bit of a lecture on the projectors and format before the showing. Pointed out that it’s the proper classic setup with two projectors and not the later 80’s era setup with one projector and platters which most of the few surviving 70 mm installations in the world use. So I recommend that format. :lol:
Rocket J Squrriel
Posts: 624
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 5:23 pm

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Rocket J Squrriel »

Bernard Woolley wrote: Sat Jul 29, 2023 9:48 pm I saw it on an IMAX screen. Which I heartily recommend.
600 pounds and 11 miles long. That's the film they use in the iMax version. :o iMax also told Nolan that he had better not go beyond the running time of Oppenheimer because the film is at the limit of what can fit on the reels/trays.
Paul Nuttall
Posts: 190
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 5:19 pm

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Paul Nuttall »

Saw it last night, very good and the 3 hours just flew by.

One annoying thing was the background music got a bit overpowering in places.
User avatar
jediacademy2000
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 7:08 am

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by jediacademy2000 »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9dXwEd ... el=Insider

Ranks pretty high per this nuclear weapons expert. I need to go see the movie!
"A wise man fears three things: a night with no moon, a storm while at sea, and the anger of a gentle man."
User avatar
Pdf27
Posts: 851
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:49 pm

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Pdf27 »

kdahm wrote: Tue Jul 25, 2023 4:50 pmNow let's see, where's my piecutter? Anyone have the coordinates for Barbie's Beach House, or her Malibu Mansion? Think Trinity would be too big or too small?
image_2023-08-18_125009596.png
I'm just outside the effects radius for Trinity, but it looks like it should be sufficient. Try not to scale up too much - if you used Castle Bravo I'd get turned into a crispy critter.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
War is less costly than servitude. The choice is always between Verdun and Dachau. - Jean Dutourd
Leander
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2022 8:21 pm

Re: Oppenheimer

Post by Leander »

Paul Nuttall wrote: Fri Aug 11, 2023 10:15 am Saw it last night, very good and the 3 hours just flew by.

One annoying thing was the background music got a bit overpowering in places.
I finally saw it this weekend.
That background music was far too loud. There was no need for it, not when it was a dialogue driven film, not an action one.
Post Reply